BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 195(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi1,485Mumbai1,468Chennai608Bangalore543Kolkata287Ahmedabad265Jaipur183Hyderabad92Pune89Chandigarh86Karnataka52Rajkot51Raipur49Surat48Cochin41Calcutta40Lucknow35Indore34Visakhapatnam33Nagpur24Guwahati16Cuttack14Patna12Agra10SC10Dehradun9Allahabad8Panaji7Telangana6Jodhpur6Amritsar5Jabalpur4Orissa2Ranchi2Rajasthan1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Punjab & Haryana1Kerala1

Key Topics

Section 2635Section 2(22)(e)4Section 682Section 195(1)2Disallowance2

COMNR.OF INCOME TAX vs. PARADEEP PHOSPHATES

ITA/113/2013HC Orissa15 Nov 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Section 143(3)Section 195(1)Section 263Section 40

disallowance of expenditure of Rs.1344,63,25,000/- under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. According to the CIT, the aforementioned sum claimed as expenditure towards import value of machinery, spares and raw materials and charged to the P&L account would not be eligible for deduction since the Assessee had not deducted tax under Section 195(1

M/S.BHASKAR TRADERS vs. ASST.COMMKNR.OF INCOME TAX,BERHAMPUR

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/174/2018HC Orissa
30 Mar 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 132Section 153ASection 2(22)(e)Section 68

1 of 4 later issued notice under Section 153A of the Act. He contested the notice and ultimately suffered several adverse orders by way of final assessment, which resulted in substantial additions. These additions primarily were on account of (a) alleged unexplained credit-brought to tax under Section 68, and, (b) the amounts secured as loan were treated as “deemed