BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “depreciation”+ Section 143clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,455Delhi3,459Bangalore1,308Chennai1,084Kolkata1,013Ahmedabad519Jaipur300Hyderabad281Pune255Chandigarh162Surat143Indore142Cochin128Amritsar120Karnataka115Raipur110Rajkot83Visakhapatnam82Lucknow80Nagpur52Cuttack45Jodhpur45Guwahati38Telangana32SC31Patna24Dehradun21Ranchi20Panaji19Calcutta16Kerala15Agra12Allahabad10Varanasi8Punjab & Haryana7Jabalpur6Orissa4ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Tripura1Gauhati1Rajasthan1Himachal Pradesh1D.K. JAIN H.L. DATTU JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1

Key Topics

Section 14A3Depreciation3Section 2602Section 45(2)2Section 143(3)2Section 1482Addition to Income2

INDUSTRIAL INCUBATOR vs. DY.COMMNR.OF I.T.

ITA/179/2004HC Orissa10 Nov 2021

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 148

depreciation in the sum of Rs.19,92,359/- and computing the net loss at Rs.2,94,790. Pursuant to the notice issued under Section 142(1) of the IT Act, the books of accounts and other documents were produced. 5. In the assessment order dated 17th March, 1998 for the AY 1994-95 under Section 143

ISPAT ALLOYS LTD. vs. DY.COMMNR.OF I.T.

The appeal is allowed in the above terms with no

ITA/14/2003HC Orissa10 Nov 2021

Bench: The Assessing Officer (Ao) & Claimed Depreciation Allowance On The Increased Cost Of The Plant & Machinery Due To Exchange Fluctuations. The Ao In The Assessment Order Dated 31St March 1997 Rejected The Above Claim.

Section 43Section 43A

depreciation by the Assessee is allowable under Section 43A of the Income Tax Act, 1961?” 3. The brief facts are that the Appellant-Assessee filed its return of income for the AY 1994-95. Pursuant to a notice issued under Sections 142 (1) and 143

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,BHUBANESWAR vs. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF ORISSA LTD.

In the result, the appeal stands disposed of in terms of

ITA/33/2017HC Orissa14 Nov 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Section 115Section 115JSection 14Section 14ASection 260Section 45(2)

143(3) of the Act was passed by the Assessing Officer denying the allowances claimed by the assessee. Being aggrieved, the assessee preferred appeal before the CIT(A), which came to be partly allowed. As such, both revenue and assessee preferred the appeal before the Tribunal. The Tribunal has allowed the appeal preferred by the assessee, rejecting the revenue

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S.NEELACHAL ISPAT NIGAM LTD.

In the result, this Income Tax Appeal is allowed, setting

ITA/11/2018HC Orissa16 Mar 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 143(3)

Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. 3. The appellant filed appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals. 4. The first appellate authority, after a detailed discussion of the relevant provisions, as well as the ITA NO. 11 OF 2018 -4- adjustment of various Rules and Tribunals, allowed the Appeal in part. 5. As per the said order