BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 12A(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,155Delhi826Pune508Ahmedabad441Bangalore415Kolkata295Chennai288Jaipur273Hyderabad160Surat148Lucknow122Rajkot111Amritsar109Indore106Chandigarh99Cochin93Visakhapatnam90Karnataka58Cuttack57Nagpur54Jodhpur35Raipur34Agra33Patna25Panaji17Ranchi15Telangana14Guwahati14Calcutta13Varanasi12Allahabad11Dehradun10Jabalpur10SC7Punjab & Haryana6Rajasthan5Kerala4Orissa2Himachal Pradesh2Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 12A10Section 260A2Section 32Section 11A2Section 42Charitable Trust2Exemption2

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S.E CITY PROJECTS LUCKNOW (P) LD.

The appeals are dismissed and substantial questions

ITA/85/2018HC Orissa05 Jul 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

For Appellant: Mr. Tilak Mitra, AdvFor Respondent: Mr. J. P. Khaitan, Senior Adv
Section 11ASection 12ASection 260ASection 3Section 4

12A of the Act. Further it was pointed out that the assessment for the years 2007- 08 to 2014-15 had been completed accepting the assessee as a charitable trust and allowing the benefit of Section 11 of the Act. Thus, the assessee stated that there is no material or evidence before the CIT(E) to hold that the trust

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION) vs. KIIT-TECHNOLOGY BUSINESS INCUBATOR(KIIT TBI)

The appeals are dismissed and substantial questions

ITA/87/2018HC Orissa11 Dec 2019

Bench: MR. JUSTICE K. S. JHAVERI (CJ),MR. JUSTICE K.R.MOHAPATRA

For Appellant: Mr. Tilak Mitra, AdvFor Respondent: Mr. J. P. Khaitan, Senior Adv
Section 11ASection 12ASection 260ASection 3Section 4

12A of the Act. Further it was pointed out that the assessment for the years 2007- 08 to 2014-15 had been completed accepting the assessee as a charitable trust and allowing the benefit of Section 11 of the Act. Thus, the assessee stated that there is no material or evidence before the CIT(E) to hold that the trust