BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “capital gains”+ Section 70(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,100Delhi1,638Bangalore694Chennai583Jaipur338Kolkata330Ahmedabad318Hyderabad214Chandigarh167Raipur91Pune88Indore84Cochin75Rajkot50Lucknow46Surat43Nagpur40Amritsar32Visakhapatnam26SC23Calcutta23Karnataka20Guwahati15Dehradun15Jodhpur13Cuttack12Patna8Agra6Telangana5Allahabad5Jabalpur5Ranchi5Rajasthan4Kerala3Orissa2D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1Punjab & Haryana1Andhra Pradesh1Panaji1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Section 1434Section 2214Section 1402

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S.S.C.PADHEE

Appeals are disposed of

ITA/3/2018HC Orissa23 Mar 2022

Bench: The Trial Court. I.E., Appellant No.1 As Accused No.1/Company & Appellant Nos.2 To 4 As Accused Nos. 2 To 4.

Section 140Section 143Section 156Section 208Section 221Section 276Section 278Section 421

70,81,629/- was shown as short term capital gains. 4 iv) Accused No.1/Company is expected to pay the income tax either by way of advance tax as required under Section 208 of the Act or at least along with filing of returns in terms of Section 140-A of the Act. As per Section

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1,BHUBANESWAR vs. SEKHAR KUMAR MOHAPATRA

ITA/9/2024HC Orissa15 Apr 2024

Bench: DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI,MR. JUSTICE GOURISHANKAR SATAPATHY

For Appellant: Mr. Ajit Kumar, Sr. AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. Prashant Vidyarthy, Sr. Panel Counsel
Section 164Section 42

Section 164 Cr. P.C., as an accused). The investigation further revealed that Dr. Pradeep Kumar also held sensitive and important post during the period November 2000 to August 2009 and was found in possession of pecuniary resources, or property, disproportionate to his known source of income. He had acquired assets either in his own name or in the name