BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “capital gains”+ Section 55clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,282Delhi1,769Bangalore776Chennai576Kolkata399Ahmedabad368Jaipur317Hyderabad241Chandigarh170Pune116Indore103Cochin73Raipur68Nagpur59Rajkot54Surat53Lucknow46Panaji42Visakhapatnam34SC27Calcutta25Amritsar23Ranchi18Cuttack18Patna14Jodhpur13Karnataka11Guwahati9Kerala8Dehradun7Jabalpur6Allahabad6Rajasthan5Telangana4Orissa2MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Gauhati1Agra1Varanasi1Punjab & Haryana1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Andhra Pradesh1

M/S.SHEETAL REAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

In the result, the appeal fails and the substantial questions of law

ITA/83/2010HC Orissa08 Feb 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 372A

Section 14A of the Act. It was pointed out that the said conclusion is reached because nexus has not been established between expenditure disallowed and earning of exempt income. The revenue failed to substantiate their argument that the assessee was required to maintain separate accounts and that the revenue has failed ITA/83/2010 REPORTABLE Page 50 of 60 to refer

NALCO vs. COMNR.OF INCOME TAX

ITA/133/2012HC Orissa09 May 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani & The Hon’Ble Justice Rajarshi Bharadwaj Date : 16Th January, 2024 Appearance : Sri Vipul Kundalia, Adv. Smt. Oindrilla Ghosal, Adv. ...For The Appellant. Sri J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv. Sri Sanjoy Bhaumik, Adv. Smt. Swapna Das, Adv. ...For The Respondent. 1. Heard Sri Vipul Kundalia, Learned Senior Standing Counsel For The Appellant/Revenue & Sri J.P. Khaitan, Learned Senior Advocate Assisted By Sri Sanjoy Bhaumik & Smt. Swapna Das, Learned Advocates For The Respondent/Assessee. 2. This Appeal Was Admitted By This Court By An Order Dated 30.11.2012 On The Following Substantial Questions Of Law: “1) Whether In View Of The Facts & Circumstances Of The Instant Case The Tribunal Erred By Not Considering That Subsides Which May Be Used Freely

Section 43(6)Section 89

55,052/- as expenditure deductible from income, which was disallowed by the assessing officer relying upon a decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Enterprising Enterprises v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, reported in (2007) 293 ITR 437. Aggrieved by the aforesaid disallowance made by the assessing officer, the respondent/assessee filed an appeal before the Commissioner