BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “capital gains”+ Deductionclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,413Delhi3,390Bangalore1,786Chennai1,695Kolkata883Ahmedabad692Jaipur514Hyderabad451Pune410Chandigarh258Indore241Cochin165Surat132Raipur116Nagpur102Lucknow99Rajkot87SC83Visakhapatnam83Panaji56Amritsar54Karnataka51Cuttack48Patna43Dehradun41Agra36Jodhpur33Calcutta21Kerala20Jabalpur18Guwahati14Telangana10Varanasi9Ranchi8Allahabad8Punjab & Haryana7Rajasthan5Orissa3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Andhra Pradesh1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Himachal Pradesh1K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Gauhati1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1

Key Topics

Section 14A3Section 2602Section 45(2)2Capital Gains2Deduction2Disallowance2Addition to Income2

M/S.SHEETAL REAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

In the result, the appeal fails and the substantial questions of law

ITA/83/2010HC Orissa08 Feb 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 260ASection 372A

capital gains and had the assessee shown the gain as its business income the rate of tax would have been same but the assessee would have been able to claim many more deduction

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,BHUBANESWAR vs. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF ORISSA LTD.

In the result, the appeal stands disposed of in terms of

ITA/33/2017HC Orissa14 Nov 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Section 115Section 115JSection 14Section 14ASection 260Section 45(2)

deduction while computing business income of a banking company even though conversion of securities from investments to Stock in Trade attracts provision' of Section 45(2) and also that the Bank had no working regarding deprecated value of assets and capital gains

NALCO vs. COMNR.OF INCOME TAX

ITA/133/2012HC Orissa09 May 2022

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice Surya Prakash Kesarwani & The Hon’Ble Justice Rajarshi Bharadwaj Date : 16Th January, 2024 Appearance : Sri Vipul Kundalia, Adv. Smt. Oindrilla Ghosal, Adv. ...For The Appellant. Sri J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv. Sri Sanjoy Bhaumik, Adv. Smt. Swapna Das, Adv. ...For The Respondent. 1. Heard Sri Vipul Kundalia, Learned Senior Standing Counsel For The Appellant/Revenue & Sri J.P. Khaitan, Learned Senior Advocate Assisted By Sri Sanjoy Bhaumik & Smt. Swapna Das, Learned Advocates For The Respondent/Assessee. 2. This Appeal Was Admitted By This Court By An Order Dated 30.11.2012 On The Following Substantial Questions Of Law: “1) Whether In View Of The Facts & Circumstances Of The Instant Case The Tribunal Erred By Not Considering That Subsides Which May Be Used Freely

Section 43(6)Section 89

deduction. 9. The judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Enterprising Enterprise (supra) relied upon by learned counsel for the appellant has no bearing on facts of the present case inasmuch as the controversy involved in that case was as to whether the lease rent paid by the mining lessee for acquiring leasehold right for extracting