BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 5clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai6,136Delhi2,839Kolkata977Jaipur657Ahmedabad654Chennai567Surat462Pune419Bangalore379Chandigarh296Hyderabad233Indore207Raipur174Rajkot133Karnataka127Amritsar120Nagpur116Lucknow80Visakhapatnam75Guwahati75Cuttack70Cochin67Calcutta61Agra52Jodhpur49Allahabad35Patna34Ranchi29Telangana19Dehradun18Jabalpur14Varanasi8SC7Panaji5Orissa3Gauhati2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Punjab & Haryana1Bombay1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 14810Section 143(3)2Section 143(1)2Section 69C2Reassessment2Reopening of Assessment2

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) vs. INDRANI PATNAIK

ITA/55/2022HC Orissa18 Dec 2024

Bench: MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA,MR. JUSTICE M.S.SAHOO

Section 69C

5. The ITAT in the impugned order has also held as under:- In the circumstances, the action of the AO in making the impugned addition u/s 69C could only be termed as on the basis of conjectures and surmises......” (emphasis supplied) “....Thus, there is a clear finding that purchases were actually made and the same was not disputed

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. M/S. ROLAND EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST

ITA/25/2022HC Orissa09 Feb 2023

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 148

5 lakhs during the financial year 2002-03 as per the details given in the annexure. The said annexure, reproduced above, relates to a cheque received by the petitioner on October 9, 2002 from Swetu Stone PV from the bank and the account number mentioned therein. The last sentence records that as per the information, the amount received was nothing

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 vs. PARBATI MOHAPATRA

ITA/19/2022HC Orissa08 Feb 2023

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 148

5 lakhs during the financial year 2002-03 as per the details given in the annexure. The said annexure, reproduced above, relates to a cheque received by the petitioner on October 9, 2002 from Swetu Stone PV from the bank and the account number mentioned therein. The last sentence records that as per the information, the amount received was nothing