BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 28clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,209Delhi1,410Kolkata428Jaipur427Chennai298Ahmedabad287Pune211Bangalore209Surat161Chandigarh159Hyderabad152Indore122Karnataka121Raipur86Amritsar80Rajkot72Nagpur59Cochin58Guwahati48Visakhapatnam41Calcutta41Lucknow39Cuttack31Agra30Allahabad29Jodhpur24Patna16Telangana14Varanasi7Dehradun7SC6Jabalpur5Panaji5Ranchi4Orissa2ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 14810Section 143(3)2Section 143(1)2Reassessment2Reopening of Assessment2

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) vs. M/S. ROLAND EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST

ITA/25/2022HC Orissa09 Feb 2023

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 148

28. 28.1 In Signature Hotels Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (supra), the reasons for reopening as recorded by the Assessing Officer in a pro forma and placed before the Commissioner of Income-tax for approval read thus (page 56 of 338 ITR): "11. Reasons for the belief that income has escaped assessment.— Information is received from

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 vs. PARBATI MOHAPATRA

ITA/19/2022HC Orissa08 Feb 2023

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

Section 143(1)
Section 143(3)
Section 148

28. 28.1 In Signature Hotels Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (supra), the reasons for reopening as recorded by the Assessing Officer in a pro forma and placed before the Commissioner of Income-tax for approval read thus (page 56 of 338 ITR): "11. Reasons for the belief that income has escaped assessment.— Information is received from