BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 9clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi5,074Mumbai5,002Bangalore2,525Chennai1,945Kolkata1,258Pune1,009Hyderabad638Ahmedabad595Cochin437Jaipur432Raipur368Karnataka368Indore367Chandigarh304Nagpur230Patna217Visakhapatnam172Surat147Rajkot127Lucknow125Jodhpur86Cuttack71Amritsar64Telangana53Guwahati52Panaji48Agra47Ranchi44Dehradun37Jabalpur28SC23Allahabad17Kerala15Calcutta15Himachal Pradesh8Rajasthan7Varanasi5Orissa3Punjab & Haryana3J&K3Uttarakhand3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 194J6Section 201(1)4Section 271C4Section 2013Section 1923Section 260A2Section 194C2Section 9(1)(vii)2Deduction2TDS

M/S.SWASTHYA BIKASH SAMITTEE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/162/2018HC Orissa29 Mar 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 133ASection 194CSection 194JSection 201(1)Section 260ASection 9Section 9(1)(vii)

9(1)(vii) of the Act. The issue was examined by the Assessing Officer, who opined that the assessee was to deduct tax at source from the payments made to the sub-contractor under Section 194J of the Act. The Assessing Officer vide order dated 11.3.2013 (Annexure A-1) passed under Sections

M.D.,BHARAT MOTORS vs. A.C.OF INCOME TAX

2
Penalty2
Addition to Income2

The appeal is allowed in the above terms

ITA/132/2006HC Orissa02 Feb 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 192Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271CSection 273B

TDS, the question of categorising the Appellant as Assessee-in-default for the purposes of Section 201 (1) of the IT Act did not arise. There was, therefore, no occasion for imposition of the penalty under Section 271C of the IT Act. Page 4 of 4 9

COMMNR.INCOME TAX vs. PIYUSH KU GUPTA

ITA/123/2005HC Orissa02 Feb 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 194Section 201Section 260ASection 271C

9 of 15 (ii) given the context of the said provision which is intended to cover a wide range of transactions as is evident from the words "any other agreement or arrangement" it is evident that the principles of ejusdem generis or noscitur a sociis cannot be invoked to narrow the scope of those words. The words "any payment" occurring