BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 8(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai5,334Delhi5,329Bangalore2,567Chennai2,021Kolkata1,445Pune1,064Hyderabad763Ahmedabad729Indore563Patna547Cochin481Jaipur473Raipur443Chandigarh355Karnataka349Nagpur326Surat259Visakhapatnam234Rajkot180Lucknow150Amritsar128Cuttack105Jodhpur100Dehradun95Panaji65Agra62Ranchi62Guwahati61Jabalpur59Telangana51Allahabad38SC23Varanasi17Kerala15Calcutta14Himachal Pradesh8Rajasthan7Punjab & Haryana3J&K3Uttarakhand3Orissa3Gauhati1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 194J6Section 201(1)4Section 271C4Section 2013Section 1923Section 260A2Section 194C2Section 9(1)(vii)2Deduction2TDS

M/S.SWASTHYA BIKASH SAMITTEE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/162/2018HC Orissa29 Mar 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 133ASection 194CSection 194JSection 201(1)Section 260ASection 9Section 9(1)(vii)

TDS at the specified rates and sum. As per Clause (iv)(e) of Explanation to Section 194C, 'work' shall include manufacturing or supplying a product according to the requirement or specification of a customer by using material purchased from such customer but does not include manufacturing or supplying a product according to the requirement or specification of a customer

COMMNR.INCOME TAX vs. PIYUSH KU GUPTA

2
Penalty2
Addition to Income2
ITA/123/2005HC Orissa02 Feb 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 194Section 201Section 260ASection 271C

8 of 15 Infopark Limited v. ITO (2016) 385 ITR 465 (Mad). In support of the proposition that the payment of royalty is essentially a payment for the ‘right to do business’, reliance was placed on the decision in Shankar Trading (P) Limited v. CIT 208 Taxman 526 (Del). In support of the contention that a term used

M.D.,BHARAT MOTORS vs. A.C.OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is allowed in the above terms

ITA/132/2006HC Orissa02 Feb 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 192Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271CSection 273B

2 of 4 Bhubaneswar [CIT (A)] dismissing the Assessee’s appeal thereby affirming the penalty order passed by the Assessing Officer (AO). 4. The Appellant is the Managing Director of Bharat Motors Ltd. and has been deemed to be an Assessee-in-default for non- deduction of tax deducted source (TDS) in terms of Section 201(1) of the Income