BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “TDS”+ Section 5(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai6,090Delhi5,930Bangalore2,809Chennai2,488Kolkata1,772Pune1,239Ahmedabad1,089Hyderabad851Cochin773Indore737Jaipur580Patna558Raipur455Karnataka417Chandigarh404Nagpur398Surat316Visakhapatnam267Rajkot240Cuttack231Lucknow198Amritsar147Dehradun126Jodhpur122Jabalpur93Panaji81Ranchi78Agra78Guwahati70Telangana70Allahabad67Varanasi28SC26Calcutta21Kerala17Rajasthan9Himachal Pradesh8Punjab & Haryana7J&K5Orissa4Uttarakhand3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Gauhati1Bombay1

Key Topics

Section 194J6Section 201(1)4Section 271C4Section 2013Section 1923TDS3Section 260A2Section 194C2Section 9(1)(vii)2Deduction

M/S.SWASTHYA BIKASH SAMITTEE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/162/2018HC Orissa29 Mar 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 133ASection 194CSection 194JSection 201(1)Section 260ASection 9Section 9(1)(vii)

5. As per Section 194C of the Act, any person responsible for paying any sum to any resident for carrying out any work, in pursuance to a contract between the contractor and a specified person shall deduct and deposit TDS at the specified rates and sum. As per Clause (iv)(e) of Explanation to Section 194C, 'work' shall include manufacturing

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S.NIDAN

2
Penalty2
Addition to Income2

The Appeal is allowed

ITA/160/2018HC Orissa13 Jul 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

For Appellant: Ms. Ananya KapoorFor Respondent: Sri A Rama Krishna Reddy representing
Section 151Section 260

SECTION OFFICER 1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Benches - B, Hyderabad 2. The Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals) - ll, Hyderabad 3. The Deputy Commissioner of lncome-Tax, TDS circle-15(2), Hyderabad. 4. One CC to Ms. Ananya Kapoor, Advocate [OPUC] 5

M.D.,BHARAT MOTORS vs. A.C.OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is allowed in the above terms

ITA/132/2006HC Orissa02 Feb 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 192Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271CSection 273B

2 of 4 Bhubaneswar [CIT (A)] dismissing the Assessee’s appeal thereby affirming the penalty order passed by the Assessing Officer (AO). 4. The Appellant is the Managing Director of Bharat Motors Ltd. and has been deemed to be an Assessee-in-default for non- deduction of tax deducted source (TDS) in terms of Section 201(1) of the Income

COMMNR.INCOME TAX vs. PIYUSH KU GUPTA

ITA/123/2005HC Orissa02 Feb 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 194Section 201Section 260ASection 271C

5 of 15 paid by AAI. The demand to that extent was deleted by the CIT(A) subject to verification. It was held that the interest under Section 201(1A) of the Act had to be worked out with reference to the delay, if any. 9. In the further appeals filed by the Assessee before the ITAT, the Assessee relied