Search: TDS | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “TDS”+ Section 5clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai6,100 Delhi5,936 Bangalore2,809 Chennai2,488 Kolkata1,773 Pune1,239 Ahmedabad1,091 Hyderabad854 Cochin773 Indore737 Jaipur582 Patna558 Raipur456 Karnataka417 Chandigarh404 Nagpur398 Surat316 Visakhapatnam267 Rajkot237 Cuttack231 Lucknow198 Amritsar147 Dehradun126 Jodhpur122 Jabalpur93 Panaji81 Agra78 Ranchi76 Guwahati70 Telangana70 Allahabad67 Varanasi28 SC26 Calcutta21 Kerala17 Rajasthan9 Himachal Pradesh8 Punjab & Haryana7 J&K5 Orissa4 Uttarakhand3 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1 Gauhati1 Bombay1

Key Topics

Section 194J6 Section 201(1)4 Section 271C4 Section 2013 Section 1923 TDS3 Section 260A2 Section 194C2 Section 9(1)(vii)2 Deduction

M.D.,BHARAT MOTORS vs. A.C.OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is allowed in the above terms

ITA/132/2006HC Orissa02 Feb 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 192Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271CSection 273B

TDS was in contravention of Section 192 of the IT Act. 5. While admitting the appeal on 21st September 2007, this

M/S.SWASTHYA BIKASH SAMITTEE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/162/2018HC Orissa29 Mar 2022

DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

2

Addition to Income2

Bench:

Section 133ASection 194CSection 194JSection 201(1)Section 260ASection 9Section 9(1)(vii)

5. As per Section 194C of the Act, any person responsible for paying any sum to any resident for carrying out any work, in pursuance to a contract between the contractor and a specified person shall deduct and deposit TDS

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S.NIDAN

The Appeal is allowed

ITA/160/2018HC Orissa13 Jul 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

For Appellant: Ms. Ananya KapoorFor Respondent: Sri A Rama Krishna Reddy representing

Section 151Section 260

TDS circle-'1 5(2), Hyderabad. Between: It//s.Tata teleservices Limited, 5th Floor, KLK Estate, Fateh Maidan Road, Hydrabad ...Appellant AND Dy.Commissioner of lncome Tax Circle 15 (20, Hyderabad ...Respondent lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section

COMMNR.INCOME TAX vs. PIYUSH KU GUPTA

ITA/123/2005HC Orissa02 Feb 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 194Section 201Section 260ASection 271C

5 of 15 paid by AAI. The demand to that extent was deleted by the CIT(A) subject to verification. It was held that the interest under Section 201(1A) of the Act had to be worked out with reference to the delay, if any. 9. In the further appeals filed by the Assessee before the ITAT, the Assessee relied