BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 201(3)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,585Delhi1,545Bangalore1,107Chennai652Kolkata465Karnataka256Pune160Jaipur160Nagpur142Raipur138Ahmedabad121Hyderabad103Indore103Cochin96Chandigarh60Jodhpur45Surat44Rajkot41Lucknow40Telangana27Kerala26Panaji26Visakhapatnam22Cuttack20Patna17Agra17Amritsar16SC13Dehradun10Jabalpur10Guwahati9Ranchi9Himachal Pradesh6Varanasi4Rajasthan3Orissa3J&K1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 194J6Section 201(1)4Section 271C4Section 2013Section 1923Section 260A2Section 194C2Section 9(1)(vii)2Deduction2TDS

COMMNR.INCOME TAX vs. PIYUSH KU GUPTA

ITA/123/2005HC Orissa02 Feb 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 194Section 201Section 260ASection 271C

201(1A) of the Act was concerned, the Assessee submitted before the ITAT that with AAI having paid taxes on the income by way of royalty, there was no question for levy of interest for the alleged default of non-deduction of tax at source. 11. The Assessee’s appeals were allowed by the ITAT by the impugned order

M/S.SWASTHYA BIKASH SAMITTEE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/162/2018HC Orissa29 Mar 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

2
Penalty2
Addition to Income2
Section 133A
Section 194C
Section 194J
Section 201(1)
Section 260A
Section 9
Section 9(1)(vii)

3. After hearing learned counsel for the appellant, we do not find any merit in the appeal. 4. It would be advantageous to reproduce Section 194C of the Act which is as under:- “194C. (1) Any person responsible for paying any sum to any resident (hereafter in this section referred to as the contractor1) for carrying out any work (including

M.D.,BHARAT MOTORS vs. A.C.OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is allowed in the above terms

ITA/132/2006HC Orissa02 Feb 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 192Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271CSection 273B

201(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘IT Act’). The AO had levied a penalty of Rs.6,52,675/- on the ground that the alleged short deduction of TDS was in contravention of Section 192 of the IT Act. 5. While admitting the appeal on 21st September 2007, this Court framed the following substantial questions of law for consideration