BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 2(13)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi4,292Mumbai4,170Bangalore2,170Chennai1,467Kolkata1,029Pune636Hyderabad524Ahmedabad510Jaipur372Raipur328Karnataka310Indore310Chandigarh261Cochin252Nagpur198Visakhapatnam156Surat118Rajkot111Lucknow97Cuttack53Patna53Ranchi47Amritsar42Telangana40Agra39Dehradun39Guwahati34Panaji32Jodhpur32Jabalpur19SC19Allahabad17Kerala14Calcutta10Himachal Pradesh8Rajasthan6Varanasi5Orissa3Uttarakhand3J&K2Punjab & Haryana2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 194J6Section 260A2Section 194C2Section 9(1)(vii)2Section 1512TDS2

M/S.SWASTHYA BIKASH SAMITTEE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/162/2018HC Orissa29 Mar 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 133ASection 194CSection 194JSection 201(1)Section 260ASection 9Section 9(1)(vii)

TDS at the specified rates and sum. As per Clause (iv)(e) of Explanation to Section 194C, 'work' shall include manufacturing or supplying a product according to the requirement or specification of a customer by using material purchased from such customer but does not include manufacturing or supplying a product according to the requirement or specification of a customer

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S.NIDAN

The Appeal is allowed

ITA/160/2018HC Orissa13 Jul 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

For Appellant: Ms. Ananya KapoorFor Respondent: Sri A Rama Krishna Reddy representing
Section 151Section 260

13-03-2012 on the file of Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals) - ll, Hyderabad in ITTA. No. 0276/ClT(A)-ll/Hyd/2009-10 preferred against the Order dated 31-12-2009 in TAN.No.HYDT00554B on the file of the Deputy Commissioner of lncome-Tax, TDS circle-'1 5(2), Hyderabad. Between: It//s.Tata teleservices Limited, 5th Floor, KLK Estate, Fateh Maidan Road, Hydrabad

COMMNR.INCOME TAX vs. PIYUSH KU GUPTA

ITA/123/2005HC Orissa02 Feb 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 194Section 201Section 260ASection 271C

13. The contention of the Revenue as regards question (i) in the quantum appeals is that it stands covered in favour of the Revenue by the judgement of this Court in Apeejay Surrendera Park Hotels Limited v. Union of India (2016) 383 ITR 697 (Del) where, the Court emphasized the expanded definition of the word ‘rent’ under Section