BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “TDS”+ Section 2clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai6,212Delhi6,038Bangalore2,826Chennai2,498Kolkata1,785Pune1,198Ahmedabad825Hyderabad825Karnataka654Cochin640Patna559Jaipur512Raipur447Indore434Chandigarh375Nagpur363Surat284Visakhapatnam255Rajkot211Lucknow192Cuttack146Amritsar136Dehradun125Jodhpur111Ranchi84Telangana81Panaji77Jabalpur76Agra75Guwahati65Allahabad41Calcutta31Varanasi29SC28Kerala19Rajasthan10Himachal Pradesh8Punjab & Haryana7J&K5Orissa4Uttarakhand3Bombay1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Gauhati1

Key Topics

Section 194J6Section 201(1)4Section 271C4Section 2013Section 1923TDS3Section 260A2Section 194C2Section 9(1)(vii)2Deduction

M/S.SWASTHYA BIKASH SAMITTEE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/162/2018HC Orissa29 Mar 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 133ASection 194CSection 194JSection 201(1)Section 260ASection 9Section 9(1)(vii)

Section 201(1) w.e.f. 01.07.2012? 2. Briefly stated, the facts necessary for adjudication of the instant appeal as narrated therein may be noticed. The assessee is a contractor engaged in constructing Thermal Power Plant for Jhajjar Power Limited. On 2.2.2012, a TDS

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S.NIDAN

2
Penalty2
Addition to Income2

The Appeal is allowed

ITA/160/2018HC Orissa13 Jul 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

For Appellant: Ms. Ananya KapoorFor Respondent: Sri A Rama Krishna Reddy representing
Section 151Section 260

TDS circle-'1 5(2), Hyderabad. Between: It//s.Tata teleservices Limited, 5th Floor, KLK Estate, Fateh Maidan Road, Hydrabad ...Appellant AND Dy.Commissioner of lncome Tax Circle 15 (20, Hyderabad ...Respondent lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section

M.D.,BHARAT MOTORS vs. A.C.OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is allowed in the above terms

ITA/132/2006HC Orissa02 Feb 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 192Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271CSection 273B

2 of 4 Bhubaneswar [CIT (A)] dismissing the Assessee’s appeal thereby affirming the penalty order passed by the Assessing Officer (AO). 4. The Appellant is the Managing Director of Bharat Motors Ltd. and has been deemed to be an Assessee-in-default for non- deduction of tax deducted source (TDS) in terms of Section

COMMNR.INCOME TAX vs. PIYUSH KU GUPTA

ITA/123/2005HC Orissa02 Feb 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 194Section 201Section 260ASection 271C

2 of the LA might show that the payment by the Assessee to the AI for the operation of the executive lounge at IGI Airport is split into two distinct parts viz., , royalty and the fees for the space, it is in effect a payment for the use of the lounge for the purposes of operating it. If there