BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “TDS”+ Section 10clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi5,037Mumbai5,022Bangalore2,464Chennai1,897Kolkata1,309Pune917Hyderabad653Ahmedabad616Cochin437Jaipur430Indore389Raipur357Karnataka354Chandigarh301Nagpur226Visakhapatnam172Lucknow146Surat138Rajkot132Jodhpur83Ranchi66Cuttack65Amritsar64Patna63Guwahati51Telangana49Agra48Dehradun44Panaji44Jabalpur28SC22Allahabad17Kerala15Calcutta13Himachal Pradesh8Varanasi8Rajasthan6Punjab & Haryana4J&K3Uttarakhand3Orissa3Gauhati1Bombay1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 194J6Section 201(1)4Section 271C4Section 2013Section 1923Section 260A2Section 194C2Section 9(1)(vii)2Deduction2TDS

COMMNR.INCOME TAX vs. PIYUSH KU GUPTA

ITA/123/2005HC Orissa02 Feb 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 194Section 201Section 260ASection 271C

10. As regards interest levied under Section 201(1A) of the Act was concerned, the Assessee submitted before the ITAT that with AAI having paid taxes on the income by way of royalty, there was no question for levy of interest for the alleged default of non-deduction of tax at source. 11. The Assessee’s appeals were allowed

M.D.,BHARAT MOTORS vs. A.C.OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is allowed in the above terms

ITA/132/2006HC Orissa02 Feb 2022

DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

2
Penalty2
Addition to Income2
Bench:
Section 192Section 201Section 201(1)Section 271CSection 273B

Section 271C of the IT Act. Page 4 of 4 9. Learned Standing counsel for the Department has been unable to point out how the above orders of the CIT (A) and ITAT upholding the penalty levied by the AO on the Appellant are sustainable in law. Consequently the questions framed by this Court are all answered in favour

M/S.SWASTHYA BIKASH SAMITTEE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER

ITA/162/2018HC Orissa29 Mar 2022

Bench: DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR (CJ),MR. JUSTICE R.K.PATTANAIK

Section 133ASection 194CSection 194JSection 201(1)Section 260ASection 9Section 9(1)(vii)

TDS at the specified rates and sum. As per Clause (iv)(e) of Explanation to Section 194C, 'work' shall include manufacturing or supplying a product according to the requirement or specification of a customer by using material purchased from such customer but does not include manufacturing or supplying a product according to the requirement or specification of a customer