RAJESH SARDA,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), NAGPUR
In the result, the addition of undisclosed income under section 68 is deleted
ITA 44/NAG/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur24 Feb 2026AY 2015-16
Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Khettra Mohan Roy(Physical Hearing) Rajesh Sarda, Acit, Central Circle – 2(2), Nagpur 14, Daga Lay–Out, Ambazari Road, Vs Aayakar Bhawan, Civil Lines, Nagpur – 440033. Maharashtra – 440001. [Pan: Ahaps4925M] Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Shri K.P. Dewani, Advocate Revenue By Shri Pankaj Kumar, Cit–Dr Date Of Hearing 16.02.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 24.02.2026 Order Under Section 254(1) Of Income Tax Act
Section 10(38)Section 132Section 153ASection 234ASection 254(1)Section 68Section 69C
83,706/- and Rs.56,54,511/- is unjustified, unsustainable and perverse.
5) The learned A.O. and Hon'ble CIT(A) ought to have accepted the claim of exemption u/s 10(38) and accepted the income declared in return considering facts and evidence on record and without dislodging the same.
6) That on the facts and in the circumstances
