I.T.O. WARD -1, AMRAVATI vs. SHRI SANJAY NANASAHEB BHARSAKALE, AMRAVATI
In the result, the appeal of the department is rejected
ITA 81/NAG/2018[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur16 Jul 2024AY 2011-2012
Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member
For Appellant: Shri Manoj Moriyani, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y.Marathe, Sr.Dr
Section 131Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 250Section 269TSection 44ASection 68
269T”
4. Being aggrieved against the addition, the appeal was preferred before
CIT(A). The CIT(A) has dealt elaborately as follows:-
“5.5.1 The appellant is trading in sand the appellant has introduced a sum of Rs. 2.05 crores being advances received from 17 parties, for sand in his books of account on 03/01/2011 during the previous year relevant