BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 14A(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,268Delhi557Kolkata243Chennai231Ahmedabad222Bangalore183Pune99Hyderabad72Jaipur45Visakhapatnam30Raipur29Indore26Chandigarh21Karnataka17Cuttack16Cochin14Amritsar10Surat9Lucknow8Rajkot6Panaji6Nagpur4Varanasi4Calcutta3Guwahati2SC2Telangana2Jabalpur1Jodhpur1Dehradun1Orissa1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 14A14Section 80I10Section 684Section 10(38)4Addition to Income4Section 271(1)(c)2Capital Gains2Long Term Capital Gains2Bogus/Accommodation Entry

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE -1,RAIPUR (CG), RAIPUR (CG) vs. M/S SARDA ENERGY & MINERALS LTD , NAGPUR

The appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 224/NAG/2017[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Apr 2019AY 2011-2012
For Appellant: Shri Rajesh Loya, AdvFor Respondent: Shri U. U. Kasar, Jt. CIT
Section 14ASection 271(1)(c)Section 80I

2) of the I.T. Rules. The relevant discussion given in para 3.5 of the assessment order and the same is extracted hereunder :- “3.5 In view of the above, I am of the opinion that certain portion of expenditure incurred by the assessee has to be disallowed u/s. 14A, regarding expenditure incurred for earning the income, not forming the part

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE -1,RAIPUR (CG), RAIPUR (CG) vs. M/S SARDA ENERGY & MINERALS LTD , NAGPUR

The appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

2
Penny Stock2
Exemption2
Penalty2
ITA 225/NAG/2017[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Apr 2019AY 2012-2013
For Appellant: Shri Rajesh Loya, AdvFor Respondent: Shri U. U. Kasar, Jt. CIT
Section 14ASection 271(1)(c)Section 80I

2) of the I.T. Rules. The relevant discussion given in para 3.5 of the assessment order and the same is extracted hereunder :- “3.5 In view of the above, I am of the opinion that certain portion of expenditure incurred by the assessee has to be disallowed u/s. 14A, regarding expenditure incurred for earning the income, not forming the part

ACIT-CENTRAL CIRCLE -2(1), NAGPUR vs. SHRI NANDKUMAR KHATTUMAL HARCHANDANI , NAGPUR

ITA 410/NAG/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Feb 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Manoj G. MoryaniFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 10(38)Section 68

14A was not sustainable. In view of the fact claim made by the assessee is true and correct and same may kindly be allowed.” The learned CIT(A), while considering the submissions of the assessee emphatically, held that the addition made by the Assessing Officer is factually as well as legally incorrect and the disallowance of exemption under section

ACIT-CENTRAL CIRCLE -2(1), NAGPUR vs. SHRI NANDKUMAR KHATTUMAL HARCHANDANI , NAGPUR

In the result, appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 411/NAG/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Feb 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Manoj G. MoryaniFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 10(38)Section 68

2 Shri Nandkumar Khatumal Harchandani ITA no.410/Nag./2019 A.Y. 2014–15 ii) On the facts and circumstances of the case & in law, the Ld. CIT(A) failed to appreciate the ground realities that the documents in the case of shell companies are always in order so that they can act as a conduit in aiding tax evasion