BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 14Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai678Delhi236Chennai103Ahmedabad84Kolkata68Hyderabad40Pune24Raipur23Bangalore21Visakhapatnam20Jaipur18Chandigarh15Amritsar9Indore8Lucknow8Cochin7Cuttack7Panaji3Rajkot2Nagpur2Surat2Dehradun1Jodhpur1Ranchi1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 684Section 10(38)4Capital Gains2Long Term Capital Gains2Bogus/Accommodation Entry2Penny Stock2Exemption2Addition to Income2

ACIT-CENTRAL CIRCLE -2(1), NAGPUR vs. SHRI NANDKUMAR KHATTUMAL HARCHANDANI , NAGPUR

ITA 410/NAG/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Feb 2025AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Manoj G. MoryaniFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 10(38)Section 68

14A was not sustainable.\nIn view of the fact claim made by the assessee is true and correct and same may kindly be allowed.”\nThe learned CIT(A), while considering the submissions of the assessee emphatically, held that the addition made by the Assessing Officer is factually as well as legally incorrect and the disallowance of exemption under section

ACIT-CENTRAL CIRCLE -2(1), NAGPUR vs. SHRI NANDKUMAR KHATTUMAL HARCHANDANI , NAGPUR

In the result, appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 411/NAG/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur
25 Feb 2025
AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Manoj G. MoryaniFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 10(38)Section 68

price of M/s. ParagShilp Infrastructure & Services Ltd. to enable to assessee to legitimize his unaccounted fund. x) On the facts and circumstances of the case & in law, the Ld. CIT(A) failed to appreciate that the entire gamut of direct & circumstantial evidence placed on record shows that claim of Long Term Capital Gain is Bogus in nature