Search: section 68

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 92Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi233 Mumbai177 Bangalore85 Ahmedabad70 Kolkata38 Hyderabad32 Pune25 Chennai17 Jaipur14 Chandigarh13 Indore8 Surat7 Visakhapatnam3 Nagpur3 Panaji2 Karnataka2 Ranchi1 Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 2513 Deduction3 Disallowance3 Comparables/TP3

DY. C.I.T. CIR-.5, NAGPUR vs. M/S AVANTHA HOLDINGS LTD.,, CHANDRAPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 248/NAG/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur04 Apr 2025AY 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri Kishore P. DewaniFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke

Section 251

68,734/– is directed to be deleted. This ground is therefore allowed.\"\n9.2 We have heard both the parties and perused the materials available on record. In this case, it is noted that the AO made an addition of Rs.8,65,86,734/- treating the long term capital loss as a business loss. However, the Id. CIT(A) taking into

AVANTHA HOLDINGS LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. A.C.I.T. CIR-5,, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 45/NAG/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur04 Apr 2025

DY. C.I.T. CIR-.5, NAGPUR vs. M/S AVANTHA HOLDINGS LTD.,, CHANDRAPUR

AVANTHA HOLDINGS LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. A.C.I.T. CIR-5,, NAGPUR

DY. C.I.T. CIR-.5, NAGPUR vs. M/S AVANTHA HOLDINGS LTD.,, CHANDRAPUR

AVANTHA HOLDINGS LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. A.C.I.T. CIR-5,, NAGPUR

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NAGPUR vs. AVANTHA HOLDINGS LIMITED, CHANDRAPUR