Search: section 68 | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

282 results for “section 68”+ Section 7clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi10,216 Mumbai8,820 Kolkata2,772 Bangalore2,521 Ahmedabad2,072 Chennai1,984 Jaipur1,461 Hyderabad1,360 Pune1,270 Surat900 Chandigarh858 Indore797 Karnataka789 Cochin607 Raipur457 Rajkot453 Visakhapatnam411 Nagpur282 Lucknow267 Amritsar256 Agra238 Cuttack231 Guwahati209 Telangana157 Jodhpur135 Patna135 Ranchi132 SC118 Jabalpur115 Calcutta103 Allahabad101 Panaji97 Dehradun94 Varanasi48 Rajasthan22 Orissa13 Kerala13 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN5 Uttarakhand4 Punjab & Haryana3 Gauhati3 ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI2 Himachal Pradesh1 Tripura1 HARJIT SINGH BEDI CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD1 K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1 ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1 ARIJIT PASAYAT C.K. THAKKER1 A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1 Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)92 Section 153A88 Section 6875 Section 153C65 Addition to Income62 Section 69C38 Section 14836 Section 14723 Section 25019 Search & Seizure

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCEL-1(2, NAGPUR vs. M/S. VIBRANT GLOBAL CAPITAL LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 229/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Oct 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Kishore P. DewaniFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 68

68 in para 4 to 7 as under: "4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. Section 68

ITO, WARD- 1)1), NAGPUR vs. AXYKNO ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD., NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Showing 1–20 of 282 · Page 1 of 15

...

16

Unexplained Cash Credit14

ITA 47/NAG/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur02 Sept 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Hirani a/wFor Respondent: Shri Kailash C. Kanojiya

Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 68

section 68, and following the judgement of Hon'ble ITAT, Nagpur bench in appellant's own case for AY 2011-12, the addition made of Rs.1,58,50,000/- u/s 68 in the case of the appellant is deleted. The grounds of appeal are allowed. 5.0 In the result, the appeal is allowed.” M/s. Axykno Enterprises

AXYKNO CAPITAL SERVICES LTD,,NAGPUR vs. DCIT CIRCLE 1, NAGPUR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 178/NAG/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Jun 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Hirani, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Vitthal M. Bhosale (JCIT-DR)

Section 132(4)Section 147Section 148Section 68

68 of the Act. i. The said additions were confirmed by the CIT (Appeals). The Ld. AR during the course of hearing strongly opposed the actions of the AO and challenged the reopening of the assessment under section 147 as bad in law and further challenged the additions made on merits as well. 2. The Ld. DR relied

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 5(3),, NAGPUR vs. M/S. 21ST CENTURY INFRASTRUCTURE (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NAGPUR

In the result, the appeal of the Department is dismissed

ITA 207/NAG/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Jun 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am

For Appellant: Shri MahaveerAtal, CAFor Respondent: ShriPiyushKohle, CIT-DR

Section 133(6)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 56

7 (c) In any case, we may point out that the amendment to section 68 of the Act by the addition

RAMKRUSHNA ZILBAJI THAKRE ,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , WRAD -4(4), NAGPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 207/NAG/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur15 Jul 2022AY 2010-11

For Appellant: Dr. Milind Bhusare, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vitthal M. Bhosale, Jt. CIT

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 234BSection 68

68 of the Income Tax Act 1961. In this respect it is submitted that the assessee has not maintained any books of accounts and addition is confirmed by Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-l, Nagpur on the basis of amount deposited in joint saving bank account of assessee and his spouse. 7. As per provision of section

SHRI SANJAY DHANRAJ JAIN,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), NAGPUR

In the result, assessee' appeal for A

ITA 55/NAG/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Feb 2025AY 2012-13

Section 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 234A

7,595, and the addition to that extent is confirmed. Thus, ground no.4, raised by the assessee is partly allowed. The issue raised by the assessee in grounds no.5 and 6, relates to the addition of ₹ 15 lakh on account of unsecured loan under section 68

SHRI SANJAY DHANRAJ JAIN,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), NAGPUR

ITA 57/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Feb 2025AY 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh LoyaFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke

Section 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 234A

7,595, and the addition to that extent is confirmed. Thus,\nground no.4, raised by the assessee is partly allowed.\nThe issue raised by the assessee in grounds no.5 and 6, relates to the\naddition of ₹ 15 lakh on account of unsecured loan under section 68

RAVINDRA MADANLAL KHANDELWAL,AKOLA vs. DCIT/ACIT CIRCLE , AKOLA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 375/NAG/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur18 Nov 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke

Section 142(1)Section 143Section 144BSection 68

Section 68 of the Act was upheld by dismissing the ground raised by the assessee. 7. Ground no.2, relates

THE DY. C.I.T., CENTRAL CIR. 2(1),, NAGPUR vs. M/S MAHAVIR COAL RESOURCES PVT. LTD.,,

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue for A

ITA 385/NAG/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur08 Jan 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Kishore P. DewaniFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke

Section 132(1)Section 153C

section 68 of the Act is unjustified and unsustainable. Various judicial precedents relied upon in the submission of assessee are as under:– i) CIT v/s Lovely Exports Pvt. Ltd. [2008] 216 CTR 195 (SC); “2. Can the amount of share money be regarded as undisclosed income under s. 68 of IT Act, 1961? We find no merit in this

SHRI SANJAY DHANRAJ JAIN,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), NAGPUR

ITA 59/NAG/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Feb 2025AY 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh LoyaFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke

Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 234A

7,595, and the addition to that extent is confirmed. Thus,\nground no.4, raised by the assessee is partly allowed.\n24. The issue raised by the assessee in grounds no.5 and 6, relates to the\naddition of ₹ 15 lakh on account of unsecured loan under section 68

THE DY. C.I.T., CENTRAL CIR. 2(1),, NAGPUR vs. M/S MAHAVIR COAL RESOURCES PVT. LTD.,,

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue for A

ITA 386/NAG/2014[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur08 Jan 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Kishore P. DewaniFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke

7. We have heard the arguments of rival parties in the light of the judicial precedents relied upon, perused the other material available on record and gone through the orders of the authorities below. In assessee’s case, the addition has been made by the Assessing Officer at ` 668.98 lakh under section 68

SHRI SANJAY DHANRAJ JAIN,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), NAGPUR

In the result, assessee' appeal for A

ITA 58/NAG/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Feb 2025AY 2015-16

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh LoyaFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke

Section 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 234A

7,595, and the addition to that extent is confirmed. Thus,\nground no.4, raised by the assessee is partly allowed.\n\n24. The issue raised by the assessee in grounds no.5 and 6, relates to the\naddition of ₹ 15 lakh on account of unsecured loan under section 68

SHRI SANJAY DHANRAJ JAIN,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), NAGPUR

ITA 54/NAG/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Feb 2025AY 2011-12

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh LoyaFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke

Section 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 234A

7,595, and the addition to that extent is confirmed. Thus,\nground no.4, raised by the assessee is partly allowed.\n\n24. The issue raised by the assessee in grounds no.5 and 6, relates to the\naddition of ₹ 15 lakh on account of unsecured loan under section 68

SHRI SANJAY DHANRAJ JAIN,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), NAGPUR

ITA 56/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh LoyaFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke

Section 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 234A

7,595, and the addition to that extent is confirmed. Thus,\nground no.4, raised by the assessee is partly allowed.\n24. The issue raised by the assessee in grounds no.5 and 6, relates to the\naddition of ₹ 15 lakh on account of unsecured loan under section 68

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-4, NAGPUR, NAGPUR vs. SHIKHA INDRAKUMAR AGRAWAL, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 239/NAG/2023[2015]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur10 Apr 2026

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Khettra Mohan Roy

For Appellant: Shri K.P. Dewani, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Surjit Kumar Saha, Sr. DR

Section 10(38)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68Section 69C

68 as well as the consequential addition under section 69C of the Act. 6 7. The learned counsel for the assessee

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1),NAGPUR, NAGPUR vs. M/S. RADHA MADHAV DEVELOPER, NAGPUR

In the result, all the six appeals preferred by the department are dismissed

ITA 48/NAG/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur29 Jul 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

Section 142ASection 145

7. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT(A) in holding that the scope of section 153A is limited assessing only search related income, thereby denying Revenue the opportunity of taxing other escaped income that comes to the notice of the AO. 8. On the facts and circumstances of the case

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), NAGPUR vs. M/S. RADHA RADHAV DEVELOPER, NAGPUR

In the result, all the six appeals preferred by the department are dismissed

ITA 49/NAG/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur29 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

Section 142ASection 145

7. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT(A) in holding that the scope of section 153A is limited assessing only search related income, thereby denying Revenue the opportunity of taxing other escaped income that comes to the notice of the AO. 8. On the facts and circumstances of the case

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), NAGPUR vs. M/S. RADHA MADHAV DEVELOPER , NAGPUR

In the result, all the six appeals preferred by the department are dismissed

ITA 47/NAG/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur29 Jul 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

Section 142ASection 145

7. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT(A) in holding that the scope of section 153A is limited assessing only search related income, thereby denying Revenue the opportunity of taxing other escaped income that comes to the notice of the AO. 8. On the facts and circumstances of the case

ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), NAGPUR vs. M/S RADHA MADHAV DEVELOPER, NAGPUR

In the result, all the six appeals preferred by the department are dismissed

ITA 26/NAG/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur29 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

Section 142ASection 145

7. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT(A) in holding that the scope of section 153A is limited assessing only search related income, thereby denying Revenue the opportunity of taxing other escaped income that comes to the notice of the AO. 8. On the facts and circumstances of the case

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(1), NAGPUR vs. M/S. RADHA MADHAV DEVELOPER, NAGPUR

In the result, all the six appeals preferred by the department are dismissed

ITA 140/NAG/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur29 Jul 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

Section 142ASection 145

7. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT(A) in holding that the scope of section 153A is limited assessing only search related income, thereby denying Revenue the opportunity of taxing other escaped income that comes to the notice of the AO. 8. On the facts and circumstances of the case