FAHIMUDDIN INAMDAR,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 4(2), NAGPUR
The appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 241/NAG/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur22 Mar 2024AY 2015-16
Bench: Hon’Ble Shri S. S. Godara & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No. 241/Nag/2023 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2015-16 Fahimuddin Inamdar 340, Opp. Qidwai Ground, Lashkaribaug, Nagpur-440017 Pan: Aaypi7048E . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant बिधम / V/S Income Tax Officer Ward-4(2), Nagpur. . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent द्वधरध / Appearances Assessee By : Mr R V Loya [‘Ld. Ar’] Revenue By : Mr Abhay Marathe [‘Ld. Dr’] सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Conclusive Hearing : 22/03/2024 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 22/03/2024 आदेश/ Order Per G. D. Padmahshali, Am; By This Appeal The Assessee Impugns The Din & Order No. Itba/Nfac/S/250/2023-24/1053135085(1) Dt. 24/05/2023 Passed U/S 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [‘The Act’ Hereinafter] By The National Faceless Appellate Centre [‘Nfac’ Hereinafter] For Assessment Year 2015-16 [‘Ay’ Hereinafter].
For Appellant: Mr R V Loya [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Abhay Marathe [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 143(3)Section 246A(1)(a)Section 250Section 250(4)Section 68
246A(1)(a) of the Act. While dealing with assessee’s appeal the Ld.
NFAC provided as much as four opportunities vide notice dt. 31/12/2020,
21/04/2021, 17/08/2021 and finally notice dt. 18/05/2023. However, the assessee did neither comply with any of these notices nor he could place any cogent material explaining the nature and source of cash credit
