Search: section 68 | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “section 68”+ Section 14Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,580 Delhi1,032 Kolkata496 Ahmedabad346 Chennai335 Bangalore253 Pune121 Hyderabad107 Karnataka106 Jaipur83 Agra62 Indore62 Chandigarh59 Raipur50 Visakhapatnam48 Ranchi41 Cochin31 Cuttack29 Lucknow23 Surat22 Varanasi12 Rajkot11 Guwahati10 Panaji8 Calcutta7 Nagpur5 Amritsar5 Dehradun5 Jabalpur4 Telangana4 Jodhpur3 SC2 Orissa1 Allahabad1

Key Topics

Section 6810 Addition to Income5 Section 10(38)4 Section 14A4 Section 1433 Section 1473 Disallowance3 Section 402 Section 143(3)2 Section 40a

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCEL-1(2, NAGPUR vs. M/S. VIBRANT GLOBAL CAPITAL LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 229/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Oct 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Kishore P. DewaniFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 68

68 of the Act, apart from other additions out of claim of interest, disallowance under section 14A of the Act and disallowance

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), NAGPUR vs. M/S. FUELCO COAL INDIA LTD., NAGPUR

Appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

2

Long Term Capital Gains2

ITA 90/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur14 Feb 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durgarao & Shrik.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Kishore P. DewaniFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(iii)Section 40Section 40aSection 68

14A. Thus, when the financial affairs of the investor has been accepted without demur, it underscores the satisfaction of ingredients of section 68

ACIT-CENTRAL CIRCLE -2(1), NAGPUR vs. SHRI NANDKUMAR KHATTUMAL HARCHANDANI , NAGPUR

ITA 410/NAG/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Feb 2025AY 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Manoj G. MoryaniFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke

Section 10(38)Section 68

68 of the Act at ₹ 2,84,35,115.\n5. The assessee made investment in shares amounting to ₹ 20,61,59,037. The assessee has borrowed fund of ₹12,89,09,181, on which interest amounting to ₹ 17,07,742, has been paid. The assessee received dividend amounting to ₹ 48,899, which was claimed exempt under section

ACIT-CENTRAL CIRCLE -2(1), NAGPUR vs. SHRI NANDKUMAR KHATTUMAL HARCHANDANI , NAGPUR

In the result, appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 411/NAG/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Feb 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Manoj G. MoryaniFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke

Section 10(38)Section 68

68 of the Act made and confirmed by the authorities below to be unsustainable and therefore, directed the AO to deleted the said addition and accept the LTCG income shown as exempt under section 10(38) of the Act. 4. (2015) 281 CTR 241 (SC) Andaman Timber Industries –Vs- Commissioner Of Central Excise Not allowing assessee to cross-examine

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX.CIRCLE-7, NAGPUR vs. M/S BALLARPUR INDUSTRIES LTD., GURGAON

ITA 379/NAG/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 May 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya (Am) & Shri Ram Lal Negi (Jm) Assessment Year: 2008-09 The Acit, Circle-7, M/S Ballarpur Industries Ltd., Room No. 521, 5Th Floor, First India Palace, Gurgao Road, Mecl Building, Haryana Nagpur Vs. Pan : Aaacb5343E

For Appellant: Shri K.P. Dewani (AR )For Respondent: Shri Gitesh Kumar (Sr.DR))

Section 143Section 147Section 148Section 14A

68,51,846/- inter alia making disallowance of Rs. 11,25,00,000/- i.e. depreciation on Aircraft @ 40%. In the first appeal, the Ld. CIT (A) allowed the depreciation @ 40% on aircraft aero-engine and deleted the addition. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. CIT (A), the revenue has challenged the impugned order before the ITAT by raising