GOPAL PURUSHOTTAM VEGAD,AMRAVATI vs. ITO-WARD 5, AMRAVATI, AMRAVATI
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed
ITA 376/NAG/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur07 Apr 2026AY 2013-14
Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Khettra Mohan Roygopal Purushottam Vegad, Ito, Ward – 5, Amravati Vinit Vihar, Mangaldham, Vs Dastur Nagar, Amravati Pan : Ajnpv 0584 A Assessee Respondent Assessee By : Shri Ratan Sharma, Ca Revenue By : Shri Surjit Kumar Saha, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 25.02.2026 Date Of Pronouncement : 07.04.2026
For Appellant: Shri Ratan Sharma, CAFor Respondent: Shri Surjit Kumar Saha, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 282ASection 292B
147 r.w.s. 144B of the Act, dated 27.03.2022 for the Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the assessee press the ground of appeal regarding the validity of notice issued u/s. 148 of the Act by the ITO, Ward-5, Amravati. He drew our attention at page No.2 of the paper book where notice u/s
