BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Section 151A(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai108Hyderabad60Delhi57Chennai35Ahmedabad31Pune26Visakhapatnam25Jaipur18Chandigarh18Kolkata12Raipur10Rajkot6Agra5Surat4Amritsar4Lucknow4Guwahati3Bangalore2Indore2Nagpur2Dehradun1Karnataka1Cochin1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 1474Section 1483Section 249(4)(b)3Addition to Income2

SUSHMA SINGHAL,HARYANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2(2), NAGPUR, NAGPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands allowed, but only for statistical purposes

ITA 86/NAG/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Feb 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao

For Appellant: Shri Abhay AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 139(1)Section 147Section 148Section 249(4)(b)Section 69

reassessment order passed by Ld. AO as the assumption of jurisdiction u/s 147 is illegal, bad in law, invalid and not complying with the mandatory conditions of section 147 to 151A as envisaged under the Income Tax Act, 1961. 5. That the appellant craves the leave to add, modify, amend or delete any of the grounds of appeal

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, YAVATMAL, YAVATMAL vs. PIYUSH TUSHAR PARALIKAR, YAVATMAL

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 393/NAG/2024[2018]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur10 Apr 2026

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Khettra Mohan Royito, Ward-1, Yavatmal Piyush Tushar Paralikar, Vs 9, Radha Raman Nagar, Wadgaon Road, Yavatmal, Maharashtra-445001 Pan : Asepp 6032 D Revenue Assessee Assessee By : Shri Krish Sharma, Ca Revenue By : Shri Surjit Kumar Saha, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 18.02.2026 Date Of Pronouncement : 10.04.2026 Order

For Appellant: Shri Krish Sharma, CAFor Respondent: Shri Surjit Kumar Saha, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151ASection 250Section 68Section 69A

147 r.w.s. 144 of the Act assessing the total income at Rs. 1,26,86,780/- 4. Being aggrieved with the order of Ld. AO, assessee preferred appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). Before the Ld. CIT(A) 3 assessee filed detailed submissions and after considering the submissions, Ld. CIT(A) allowed the appeal of the assessee and directed