GOPAL PURUSHOTTAM VEGAD,AMRAVATI vs. ITO-WARD 5, AMRAVATI, AMRAVATI
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed
ITA 376/NAG/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur07 Apr 2026AY 2013-14
Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Khettra Mohan Roygopal Purushottam Vegad, Ito, Ward – 5, Amravati Vinit Vihar, Mangaldham, Vs Dastur Nagar, Amravati Pan : Ajnpv 0584 A Assessee Respondent Assessee By : Shri Ratan Sharma, Ca Revenue By : Shri Surjit Kumar Saha, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 25.02.2026 Date Of Pronouncement : 07.04.2026
For Appellant: Shri Ratan Sharma, CAFor Respondent: Shri Surjit Kumar Saha, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 282ASection 292B
section 282A and was not curable u/s 292B or 292BB, thus impugned notice and all consequential proceedings
3
including reassessment and penalty order were invalid an liable to be quashed.”
4. On the other hand, Ld. DR relied upon the orders passed by the revenue authorities. He further submitted that notice u/s. 148 of the Act was issued without signed
