SIMA RAVISINGH KACHHAWAH,UMRER vs. ITO WARD 3(4), NAGPUR
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 418/NAG/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 Oct 2025AY 2018-19
Bench: Shripavan Kumar Gadalesima Ravisingh Kachhawah, Girad Road, Om Nagar Umrer, ……………. Appellant Nagpur- 441203 Maharastra, Pan – Aqmpk2899K V/S Income Tax Officer ……………. Respondent Ward–3(4), Nagpur Assessee By: Shri.D.P. Lohiya.Ar Revenue By :Shri Surjit Kumar Saha.Sr.Dr
For Appellant: Shri.D.P. Lohiya.ARFor Respondent: Shri Surjit Kumar Saha.Sr.DR
Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 270A(9)Section 272(1)(d)Section 44ASection 50CSection 80C
8. On the facts and circumstances of the case the learned CIT(A) NFAC as well as the learned AO has erred in not accepting the real estate business declared under Section 44AD without any basis or independent
3
Sima Ravisingh Kachhawah
ITA no.418/NAG./2025
verification, and in addition of Rs. 76,500/- by disallowing the deduction claimed under Section