SIMA RAVISINGH KACHHAWAH,UMRER vs. ITO WARD 3(4), NAGPUR
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 418/NAG/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 Oct 2025AY 2018-19
Bench: Shripavan Kumar Gadalesima Ravisingh Kachhawah, Girad Road, Om Nagar Umrer, ……………. Appellant Nagpur- 441203 Maharastra, Pan – Aqmpk2899K V/S Income Tax Officer ……………. Respondent Ward–3(4), Nagpur Assessee By: Shri.D.P. Lohiya.Ar Revenue By :Shri Surjit Kumar Saha.Sr.Dr
For Appellant: Shri.D.P. Lohiya.ARFor Respondent: Shri Surjit Kumar Saha.Sr.DR
Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 270A(9)Section 272(1)(d)Section 44ASection 50CSection 80C
270A(9) & U/s 272(1)(d), therefore order passed is unjustified, unwarranted and excessive.
10. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the learned
CIT(A)NFAC is not justified in upholding the addition made by the AO solely on the basis of the stamp duty valuation adopted in the conveyance deed under deeming provisions, without