BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “reassessment”+ Section 264clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi175Mumbai152Chennai103Hyderabad55Jaipur46Bangalore35Kolkata33Chandigarh28Ahmedabad22Raipur19Pune14Lucknow13Surat11Indore11Patna11Panaji10Cochin9Rajkot6Nagpur6Guwahati5Cuttack4Jodhpur3Agra3Amritsar2Ranchi2Dehradun1

Key Topics

Section 6812Section 26311Section 1486Section 143(3)6Section 696Addition to Income6Reassessment4Reopening of Assessment3Natural Justice3Section 10(38)

CITY LAND ASSOCIATES,AMRAVATI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, NAGPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands dismissed

ITA 27/NAG/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur14 Feb 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri V. Durgarao & Shrik.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri R.B. AtalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 263

264 the Commissioner may, either of his own motion or on an application by the assessee, call for the records of any proceeding under the Act. However, in section 263 the expression 'on his own motion' is absent. In the absence of such an expression and also in view of the fact that there is no restriction or limitation

CHANDRAKUMAR MADHUSUDANJI JAJODIA,THANE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AMRAVATI CIRCLE

2
Section 1442
Section 69A2

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 399/NAG/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Nov 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Kishore P. DewaniFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 148Section 234ASection 36(1)(iii)Section 68Section 69A

reassessment is general in nature and is not on specific transaction of assessee. Evidence placed on record is not found to be incorrect or false. Conclusion of escapement of income tantamount to mere change of opinion. Belief of escapement of income could not be derived on the basis of report of Investigation Wing being not specific to transaction of loan

ACIT, CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR vs. SMT DISHA DEVEN MALVIYA , NAGPUR

ITA 400/NAG/2019[2009-10]Status: HeardITAT Nagpur24 Oct 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Hirani, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 68Section 69

reassessment so framed to be legal. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the reopening of the assessment and the re-assessment as completed are illegal, invalid and against the principles of natural justice. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, learned CIT(A)-I, Nagpur erred in holding that the addition made

ACIT, CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR vs. SMT DISHA DEVEN MALVIYA L/H OF LATE SHRI DEVEN MALVIYA , NAGPUR

ITA 401/NAG/2019[2009-10]Status: HeardITAT Nagpur24 Oct 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Hirani, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 68Section 69

reassessment so framed to be legal. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the reopening of the assessment and the re-assessment as completed are illegal, invalid and against the principles of natural justice. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, learned CIT(A)-I, Nagpur erred in holding that the addition made

ACIT, CIRCLE -1, NAGPUR vs. SMT DESHA DEVEN MALVIYA L/H OF LATE SHRI DEVEN MALVIYA, NAGPUR

ITA 402/NAG/2019[2010-11]Status: HeardITAT Nagpur24 Oct 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Dr. Dipak Ripote

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Hirani, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Kailash Kanojiya, Sr. DR
Section 68Section 69

reassessment so framed to be legal. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the reopening of the assessment and the re-assessment as completed are illegal, invalid and against the principles of natural justice. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, learned CIT(A)-I, Nagpur erred in holding that the addition made

ACIT-CENTRAL CIRCLE -2(1), NAGPUR vs. SHRI NANDKUMAR KHATTUMAL HARCHANDANI , NAGPUR

In the result, appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 411/NAG/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Feb 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Manoj G. MoryaniFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 10(38)Section 68

section 10(38) of the Act. 4. (2015) 281 CTR 241 (SC) Andaman Timber Industries –Vs- Commissioner Of Central Excise Not allowing assessee to cross-examine witnesses by adjudicating authority though statements of those witnesses were made as basis of impugned order, amounted in serious flaw which make impugned order nullity as it amounted to violation of principles of natural