Search: reassessment

6 results for “reassessment”+ Section 234Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 14822 Section 26315 Section 69A11 Section 143(3)10 Section 234A10 Section 688 Addition to Income6 Section 1474 Natural Justice4 Section 250

BHAWANA HARIRAM LAVHALE,AMRAVATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-3, AMRAVATI

In the result, assessee’s appeal for the assessment year 2013–14 is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 169/NAG/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur16 May 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri K.P. DewaniFor Respondent: Shri Kailash C. Kanojiya

Section 148Section 234ASection 250Section 44Section 69A

234C of I.T. Act 1961 is unjustified, unwarranted and excessive. 13. Any other ground that shall be prayed at the time of hearing.” 5. Facts in brief:- The appellant is an individual and has not filed return of income for assessment year 2013-14. The Assessing Officer had information on Insight Portal that the assessee has made credit

BHAWANA HARIRAM LAVHALE,AMRAVATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-3, AMRAVATI

BHAWANA HARIRAM LAVHALE,AMRAVATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-3, AMRAVATI

BHAWANA HARIRAM LAVHALE,AMRAVATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3, AMRAVATI

CHANDRAKUMAR MADHUSUDANJI JAJODIA,THANE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AMRAVATI CIRCLE

ABDUL ASIF ABDUL KADIR ABDUL,AKOLA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, ITO WARD-1,AKOLA, AKOLA

DAYAL COTSPIN LIMITED,AKOLA vs. ACIT, AKOLA CIRCLE, AKOLA

DATTU SAMPAT VANKHEDE,NAGPUR vs. PCIT-2, NAGPUR