LATITUDE INFRAVENTURES,NAGPUR vs. PCIT,NAGPUR-1, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for assessment year 2017–18

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

reassess the income in respect of any issue, which has escaped assessment, and such issue comes to h his notice subsequently in the course of the proceedings under this section, notwithstanding that the reasons for such issue have not been included in the reasons recorded under sub-section (2) of section 148.” 8. We have considered facts of the case

LATITUDE INFRAVENTURES,NAGPUR vs. PCIT,NAGPUR-1, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for assessment year 2017–18

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

reassess the income in respect of any issue, which has escaped assessment, and such issue comes to h his notice subsequently in the course of the proceedings under this section, notwithstanding that the reasons for such issue have not been included in the reasons recorded under sub-section (2) of section 148.” 8. We have considered facts of the case

SUSHILA BHAURAO DESHMUKH,AMRAVATI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durgarao & Shrik.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

reassessment, make a reference to a Valuation Officer to estimate the value, including fair market value, of any asset, property or investment and submit a copy of report to him.‖ 17. Thus no reference to Valuation Officer by Assessing Officer. It is worthwhile to note that in order under section 155(15) of the Act, the 18 SushilaBhauraoDeshmukh ITAno.76/Nag./2022

PARTH ENTERPRISES ,BHADRAWATI vs. ITO WARD-2, CHANDRAPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao

reassessment under Section 147 without establishing the necessary condition of "reason to believe" that income had escaped assessment, as required under the law. The appellant had disclosed all material facts during the original assessment, and there was no failure on its part to disclose any relevant information, making the reopening unjustified and invalid. 5. The learned CIT(A), NFAC erred

ATUL MANOHARRAO YAMSANWAR,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), NAGPUR

142(1), 143(2) of the Act were also issued by the ACIT- 1(1) on various dates in the year 2020, which were duly attended by the assessee. The cases were handled by the ACIT-1(1) for good one year and then transferred to ACIT-2(1) vide order dated 22/01/2021 passed under section

UMESH SADASHIV THAKRE ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), NAGPUR

reassessment shall be passed by an Assessing\nOfficer below the rank of Joint Commissioner in respect of each assessment\nyear referred..... except with the prior approval of the Joint Commissioner.”\n20. The emphasis supplied in the above excerpt of section 153D above, is to\nhighlight the intent of the legislature regarding the necessity of application of\nmind to the draft

UMESH SADASHIV THAKRE ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), NAGPUR

142(1), 143(2) of the Act were also issued by the ACIT- 1(1) on various dates in the year 2020, which were duly attended by the assessee. The cases were handled by the ACIT-1(1) for good one year and then transferred to ACIT-2(1) vide order dated 22/01/2021 passed under section

ATUL MANOHARRAO YAMSANWAR,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), NAGPUR

142(1), 143(2) of the Act were also issued by the ACIT-\n1(1) on various dates in the year 2020, which were duly attended by the\nassessee. The cases were handled by the ACIT-1(1) for good one year\nand then transferred to ACIT-2(1) vide order dated 22/01/2021 passed\nunder section

UMESH SADASHIV THAKRE ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed and all\nthe appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

142(1), 143(2) of the Act were also issued by the ACIT-\n1(1) on various dates in the year 2020, which were duly attended by the\nassessee. The cases were handled by the ACIT-1(1) for good one year\nand then transferred to ACIT-2(1) vide order dated 22/01/2021 passed\nunder section

UMESH SADASHIV THAKRE ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), NAGPUR

142(1), 143(2) of the Act were also issued by the ACIT- 1(1) on various dates in the year 2020, which were duly attended by the assessee. The cases were handled by the ACIT-1(1) for good one year and then transferred to ACIT-2(1) vide order dated 22/01/2021 passed under section

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), NAGPUR vs. ATUL YAMSANWAR , NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed and all\nthe appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

142(1), 143(2) of the Act were also issued by the ACIT-\n1(1) on various dates in the year 2020, which were duly attended by the\nassessee. The cases were handled by the ACIT-1(1) for good one year\nand then transferred to ACIT-2(1) vide order dated 22/01/2021 passed\nunder section

YRCE EDUCATE PVT. LTD,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), NAGPUR

142(1), 143(2) of the Act were also issued by the ACIT-\n1(1) on various dates in the year 2020, which were duly attended by the\nassessee. The cases were handled by the ACIT-1(1) for good one year\nand then transferred to ACIT-2(1) vide order dated 22/01/2021 passed\nunder section

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), NAGPUR vs. ATUL YAMSANWAR , NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed and all\nthe appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

142(1), 143(2) of the Act were also issued by the ACIT-\n1(1) on various dates in the year 2020, which were duly attended by the\nassessee. The cases were handled by the ACIT-1(1) for good one year\nand then transferred to ACIT-2(1) vide order dated 22/01/2021 passed\nunder section

ATUL MANOHARRAO YAMSANWAR,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), NAGPUR

142(1), 143(2) of the Act were also issued by the ACIT-\n1(1) on various dates in the year 2020, which were duly attended by the\nassessee. The cases were handled by the ACIT-1(1) for good one year\nand then transferred to ACIT-2(1) vide order dated 22/01/2021 passed\nunder section

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), NAGPUR vs. ATUL YAMSANWAR , NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed and all\nthe appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

142(1), 143(2) of the Act were also issued by the ACIT-\n1(1) on various dates in the year 2020, which were duly attended by the\nassessee. The cases were handled by the ACIT-1(1) for good one year\nand then transferred to ACIT-2(1) vide order dated 22/01/2021 passed\nunder section

ATUL MANOHARRAO YAMSANWAR,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed and all\nthe appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

reassessment shall be passed by an Assessing\nOfficer below the rank of Joint Commissioner in respect of each assessment\nyear referred..... except with the prior approval of the Joint Commissioner.”\n20.\nThe emphasis supplied in the above excerpt of section 153D above, is to\nhighlight the intent of the legislature regarding the necessity of application of\nmind to the draft

FATTESING PUNAJI DHABRE,NAGPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX – 2, NAGPUR

In the result, this appeal of assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Khettra Mohan Roy(Physical Hearing) Fattesing Punaji Dhabre Pcit – 2, Nagpur Plot No. 132, Chandan Nagar, Post Vs Aayakar Bhawan, Civil Lines, Hanuman Nagar, Nagpur, Maharashtra – 440001. Maharashtra – 440009. [Pan: Bacpd6505Q] Appellant / Assessee Respondent / Revenue Assessee By Shri Madhav Vichare, Ca Revenue By Shri Pankaj Kumar, Cit–Dr Date Of Hearing 17.02.2026 Date Of Pronouncement 24.02.2026 Order Under Section 254(1) Of Income Tax Act

142(1) are holding different territorial jurisdictions. c. As the reassessment proceedings are illegal and invalid, the reassessment order passed in consequence of such invalid notice, is also non–est in the eyes of law. 2. On the given facts and the law, the learned Assessing Officer erred in issuing reassessment notice under section

UMESH SADASHIV THAKRE ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), NAGPUR

reassessment shall be passed by an Assessing\nOfficer below the rank of Joint Commissioner in respect of each assessment\nyear referred..... except with the prior approval of the Joint Commissioner.”\n20. The emphasis supplied in the above excerpt of section 153D above, is to\nhighlight the intent of the legislature regarding the necessity of application of\nmind to the draft

ATUL MANOHARRAO YAMSANWAR,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(1), NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed and all\nthe appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

142(1), 143(2) of the Act were also issued by the ACIT-\n1(1) on various dates in the year 2020, which were duly attended by the\nassessee. The cases were handled by the ACIT-1(1) for good one year\nand then transferred to ACIT-2(1) vide order dated 22/01/2021 passed\nunder section