Search: reassessment | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “reassessment”+ Demonetizationclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi83 Chennai78 Mumbai38 Jaipur32 Hyderabad30 Ahmedabad28 Bangalore26 Surat21 Agra16 Patna13 Jodhpur11 Rajkot11 Visakhapatnam9 Raipur9 Chandigarh7 Amritsar7 Pune7 Indore6 Lucknow6 Cochin6 Kolkata6 Cuttack2 Dehradun2 Nagpur2 Guwahati1 Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)4 Section 69A4 Section 142(1)4 Section 2502 Section 1472 Section 115B2 Cash Deposit2 Demonetization2 Addition to Income2

SUMIT PRAKASHRAO FULZELE,CHANDRAPUR vs. ITO WARD 2 , CHANDRAPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 35/NAG/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur18 Nov 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Abhay AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe

Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 144Section 250Section 69A

reassessment in case where assessee had made a deposit of cash in bank during demonetization period, which was reflected in his return

MITHILESH JAGDEO SINGH PAWAR,AMRAVATI vs. ITO WARD-5, AMRAVATI

ITA 70/NAG/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur18 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhryassessment Year: 2017-18 Mr. Mithilesh Jagdeo Singh Ito Ward-5 Pawar, Besides Dps, Vs. Ghatladki, Chandur Bazar, Saturna Road, Maharashtra - 444720. Maharashtra - 444605. Pan: Bpfpp6167L (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Assessee By : Ms. Mrudul Bhusari, Ld. Adv {Ld. Amicus Curie} Revenue By : Shri Surjit Kumar Saha, Ld. Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 26.06.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 09.2025 O R D E R Per : Narender Kumar Choudhry:

For Appellant: Ms. Mrudul Bhusari, Ld. AdvFor Respondent: Shri Surjit Kumar Saha, Ld. Sr. DR

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 2(40)Section 250Section 69A

demonetization period but had not shown the details of cash deposits accurately in the return of income. Thus, the source of cash deposits of Rs.16,43,600/- remained unexplained. 5. On the aforesaid information, the case of the Assessee was reopened u/s 147 of the Act by issuing a notice dated 31.03.2021 u/s 148 of the Act. The Assessee before