BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

29 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ TDSclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi406Mumbai331Raipur101Bangalore94Ahmedabad67Hyderabad60Chennai60Jaipur55Kolkata42Pune39Nagpur29Indore26Rajkot23Visakhapatnam20Chandigarh18Lucknow15Surat13Amritsar11Jabalpur8Guwahati7Patna6Jodhpur5Allahabad3Panaji3Dehradun2Cuttack2Agra2Ranchi1Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 194A48Section 201(1)32Section 197A32Section 143(3)28Section 25025Section 6825TDS20Exemption18Condonation of Delay17Section 201

INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD -4, AMRAVATI vs. SHRI MAHESH SHANKAR SORATE , DARYAPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 250/NAG/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur29 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Manoj G. MoryaniFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 143(3)Section 269Section 269TSection 271E

TDS on the commission paid to Shri Bagdi, and for which the commission/ interest amount was disallowed in terms of section 40(a)(ia). 7.5 The appellant has submitted that he had made the repayment by using online cash deposit facility of the bank, which was out of his cash sales, and had insisted on such direct deposits to payee

Showing 1–20 of 29 · Page 1 of 2

16
Section 19116
Deduction16

MAHESHKUMAR HARGOVIND GOYAL,NAGPUR vs. WARD 1(2), NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 322/NAG/2023[AY 2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur16 May 2024

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Smt. Veena AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 68

TDS amount; (5) As per the notice mentions that the bank interest income of Rs. 2,19,894/- as per 26AS has not been taken by us in our income but no Interest income is being reflected in our 26AS as on 21.12.2018 from bank. (6) Also the cash books are not available with us now it has been more

SANJAY KISAN CHOPDE,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 176/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur30 Jan 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara & Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.176/Nag/2022 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2014-15 Sanjay Kisan Chopde, The Deputy Balaji Associates, Gs 37, Vs Commissioner Of Amar Jyoti Palace, Lomat Income Tax, Circle-1, Square, Wardha Road, Nagpur. Nagpur – 440012. Pan: Abapc6968N Appellant/ Assessee Respondent/Revenue Assessee By Shri Abhay Agrawal – Advocate Revenue By Shri Abhay Y. Marathe – Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 25/01/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 30/01/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax(Appeals)[Nfac], Dated 30.3.2022 Emanating From Assessment Order Under Section 143(3) Dated 30.06.2016 For A.Y.2014-15. The Grounds Of Appeal Raised By The Assessee Are As Under : Sanjay Kisan Chopde [A]

Section 143(3)Section 271

TDS credit. The assessee has come forward with the explanation only when confronted during the assessment proceedings. Therefore an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- is added back to total income of the assessee. Penalty proceeding u/s 271

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-2, NAGPUR vs. M/S UNITED BUILDERS , BHANDARA

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed

ITA 56/NAG/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur14 Aug 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Kailash C. Kanojiya
Section 133(6)Section 143(3)

Penalty proceeding under section 271(1)(c) of the Act was initiated separately. The assessee being aggrieved, carried the matter before the learned CIT(A). 7. The learned CIT(A), in view of the submissions made by the assessee, held that the action of the Assessing Officer in making the impugned addition is not found to be sustainable

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 408/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury(Through Virtual Hearing)

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rajat Singhai, Sr.DR
Section 191Section 194ASection 197ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS provisions under the section. Information was collected from Zonal office as regards the branches paying/crediting interest to customers’ accounts, for an amount in excess of the basic exemption limit, without deduction of tax at source on receiving Form Nos.15G/15H. On perusal of such information, the AO noted certain cases, as tabulated in his order, where interest paid was more

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 401/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury(Through Virtual Hearing)

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rajat Singhai, Sr.DR
Section 191Section 194ASection 197ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS provisions under the section. Information was collected from Zonal office as regards the branches paying/crediting interest to customers’ accounts, for an amount in excess of the basic exemption limit, without deduction of tax at source on receiving Form Nos.15G/15H. On perusal of such information, the AO noted certain cases, as tabulated in his order, where interest paid was more

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(10, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 402/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Sept 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury(Through Virtual Hearing)

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rajat Singhai, Sr.DR
Section 191Section 194ASection 197ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS provisions under the section. Information was collected from Zonal office as regards the branches paying/crediting interest to customers’ accounts, for an amount in excess of the basic exemption limit, without deduction of tax at source on receiving Form Nos.15G/15H. On perusal of such information, the AO noted certain cases, as tabulated in his order, where interest paid was more

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 403/NAG/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Sept 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury(Through Virtual Hearing)

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rajat Singhai, Sr.DR
Section 191Section 194ASection 197ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS provisions under the section. Information was collected from Zonal office as regards the branches paying/crediting interest to customers’ accounts, for an amount in excess of the basic exemption limit, without deduction of tax at source on receiving Form Nos.15G/15H. On perusal of such information, the AO noted certain cases, as tabulated in his order, where interest paid was more

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1),, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 396/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury(Through Virtual Hearing)

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rajat Singhai, Sr.DR
Section 191Section 194ASection 197ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS provisions under the section. Information was collected from Zonal office as regards the branches paying/crediting interest to customers’ accounts, for an amount in excess of the basic exemption limit, without deduction of tax at source on receiving Form Nos.15G/15H. On perusal of such information, the AO noted certain cases, as tabulated in his order, where interest paid was more

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCEL-51(1), NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 397/NAG/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury(Through Virtual Hearing)

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rajat Singhai, Sr.DR
Section 191Section 194ASection 197ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS provisions under the section. Information was collected from Zonal office as regards the branches paying/crediting interest to customers’ accounts, for an amount in excess of the basic exemption limit, without deduction of tax at source on receiving Form Nos.15G/15H. On perusal of such information, the AO noted certain cases, as tabulated in his order, where interest paid was more

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 398/NAG/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury(Through Virtual Hearing)

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rajat Singhai, Sr.DR
Section 191Section 194ASection 197ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS provisions under the section. Information was collected from Zonal office as regards the branches paying/crediting interest to customers’ accounts, for an amount in excess of the basic exemption limit, without deduction of tax at source on receiving Form Nos.15G/15H. On perusal of such information, the AO noted certain cases, as tabulated in his order, where interest paid was more

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 399/NAG/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury(Through Virtual Hearing)

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rajat Singhai, Sr.DR
Section 191Section 194ASection 197ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS provisions under the section. Information was collected from Zonal office as regards the branches paying/crediting interest to customers’ accounts, for an amount in excess of the basic exemption limit, without deduction of tax at source on receiving Form Nos.15G/15H. On perusal of such information, the AO noted certain cases, as tabulated in his order, where interest paid was more

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 400/NAG/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury(Through Virtual Hearing)

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rajat Singhai, Sr.DR
Section 191Section 194ASection 197ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS provisions under the section. Information was collected from Zonal office as regards the branches paying/crediting interest to customers’ accounts, for an amount in excess of the basic exemption limit, without deduction of tax at source on receiving Form Nos.15G/15H. On perusal of such information, the AO noted certain cases, as tabulated in his order, where interest paid was more

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 404/NAG/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Sept 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury(Through Virtual Hearing)

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rajat Singhai, Sr.DR
Section 191Section 194ASection 197ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS provisions under the section. Information was collected from Zonal office as regards the branches paying/crediting interest to customers’ accounts, for an amount in excess of the basic exemption limit, without deduction of tax at source on receiving Form Nos.15G/15H. On perusal of such information, the AO noted certain cases, as tabulated in his order, where interest paid was more

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-1, NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 405/NAG/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Sept 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury(Through Virtual Hearing)

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rajat Singhai, Sr.DR
Section 191Section 194ASection 197ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS provisions under the section. Information was collected from Zonal office as regards the branches paying/crediting interest to customers’ accounts, for an amount in excess of the basic exemption limit, without deduction of tax at source on receiving Form Nos.15G/15H. On perusal of such information, the AO noted certain cases, as tabulated in his order, where interest paid was more

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE51(1), NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 406/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury(Through Virtual Hearing)

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rajat Singhai, Sr.DR
Section 191Section 194ASection 197ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS provisions under the section. Information was collected from Zonal office as regards the branches paying/crediting interest to customers’ accounts, for an amount in excess of the basic exemption limit, without deduction of tax at source on receiving Form Nos.15G/15H. On perusal of such information, the AO noted certain cases, as tabulated in his order, where interest paid was more

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 407/NAG/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury(Through Virtual Hearing)

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rajat Singhai, Sr.DR
Section 191Section 194ASection 197ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS provisions under the section. Information was collected from Zonal office as regards the branches paying/crediting interest to customers’ accounts, for an amount in excess of the basic exemption limit, without deduction of tax at source on receiving Form Nos.15G/15H. On perusal of such information, the AO noted certain cases, as tabulated in his order, where interest paid was more

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,TDS, CIRCEL-51(1), NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 393/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Sept 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury(Through Virtual Hearing)

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rajat Singhai, Sr.DR
Section 191Section 194ASection 197ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS provisions under the section. Information was collected from Zonal office as regards the branches paying/crediting interest to customers’ accounts, for an amount in excess of the basic exemption limit, without deduction of tax at source on receiving Form Nos.15G/15H. On perusal of such information, the AO noted certain cases, as tabulated in his order, where interest paid was more

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), NAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 394/NAG/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury(Through Virtual Hearing)

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rajat Singhai, Sr.DR
Section 191Section 194ASection 197ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS provisions under the section. Information was collected from Zonal office as regards the branches paying/crediting interest to customers’ accounts, for an amount in excess of the basic exemption limit, without deduction of tax at source on receiving Form Nos.15G/15H. On perusal of such information, the AO noted certain cases, as tabulated in his order, where interest paid was more

BANK OF INDIA,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS, CIRCLE-51(1), MAGPUR

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 395/NAG/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhury(Through Virtual Hearing)

For Appellant: Shri Pratik Sadrani, CAFor Respondent: Shri Rajat Singhai, Sr.DR
Section 191Section 194ASection 197ASection 201Section 201(1)Section 250

TDS provisions under the section. Information was collected from Zonal office as regards the branches paying/crediting interest to customers’ accounts, for an amount in excess of the basic exemption limit, without deduction of tax at source on receiving Form Nos.15G/15H. On perusal of such information, the AO noted certain cases, as tabulated in his order, where interest paid was more