Search: penalty u/s 271

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 80P(2)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore21 Cochin20 Visakhapatnam11 Delhi11 Amritsar10 Jaipur10 Chandigarh9 Mumbai9 Varanasi6 Chennai6 Lucknow5 Ahmedabad5 Surat4 Pune3 Nagpur3 Rajkot2 Panaji1 Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 271D7 Section 36(1)(viii)4 Section 269S4 Section 2713 Section 2693 Section 222 Section 80P2 Section 36(1)2 Deduction2

VIDHARBHA KONKAN GRAMIN BANK ,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(5) , NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

ITA 7/NAG/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Nov 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri C. NareshFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke

Section 22Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(1)(viii)Section 80P

d. Youth Development Co-Op. Bank Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT[2015 TaxPub (DT) 3360 (Pune-Trib)] In all the aforesaid decisions, it is decided by the said appellate authorities that the deduction u/s.36(1)(viia) is allowed only to the extent of the provision is made in the books of account. Moreover, the judgments of Sharada Sahakari Bank Ltd., Youth

VIDHARBHA KONKAN GRAMIN BANK ,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(5) , NAGPUR

VIDHARBHA KONKAN GRAMIN BANK ,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(5) , NAGPUR

VIDHARBHA KONKAN GRAMIN BANK ,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(5) , NAGPUR

ASHA VINOD TATTE,AMRAVATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, AMRAVATI