Search: penalty u/s 271

4 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 80P(2)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi31 Mumbai29 Bangalore26 Cochin21 Ahmedabad16 Amritsar13 Visakhapatnam11 Jaipur11 Chandigarh9 Pune7 Varanasi6 Surat6 Chennai6 Lucknow5 Nagpur4 Rajkot3 Indore3 Kolkata2 Guwahati1 Panaji1 Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 271D7 Section 80P5 Section 36(1)(viii)4 Section 269S4 Section 2713 Section 2693 Deduction3 Disallowance3 Section 222

VIDHARBHA KONKAN GRAMIN BANK ,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(5) , NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

ITA 7/NAG/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Nov 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri C. NareshFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke

Section 22Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(1)(viii)Section 80P

d. Youth Development Co-Op. Bank Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT[2015 TaxPub (DT) 3360 (Pune-Trib)] In all the aforesaid decisions, it is decided by the said appellate authorities that the deduction u/s.36(1)(viia) is allowed only to the extent of the provision is made in the books of account. Moreover, the judgments of Sharada Sahakari Bank Ltd., Youth

VIDHARBHA KONKAN GRAMIN BANK ,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(5) , NAGPUR

VIDHARBHA KONKAN GRAMIN BANK ,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(5) , NAGPUR

VIDHARBHA KONKAN GRAMIN BANK ,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(5) , NAGPUR

ASHA VINOD TATTE,AMRAVATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, AMRAVATI

PRATHAMIK SHIKSHAK KARMACHARI SAHAKARI PATSANSTHA MARYADIT vs. I.T.O. WARD -2, CHANDRAPUR