Search: penalty u/s 271

4 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 80P(2)(a)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi39 Mumbai30 Bangalore26 Cochin21 Amritsar18 Pune16 Ahmedabad16 Jaipur12 Visakhapatnam11 Indore9 Surat9 Chandigarh9 Chennai6 Varanasi6 Rajkot6 Lucknow5 Nagpur4 Kolkata3 Jodhpur2 Telangana1 Guwahati1 Panaji1 Patna1

Key Topics

Section 271D7 Section 80P5 Section 36(1)(viii)4 Section 269S4 Section 2713 Section 2693 Deduction3 Disallowance3 Section 222

VIDHARBHA KONKAN GRAMIN BANK ,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(5) , NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

ITA 7/NAG/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Nov 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri C. NareshFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke

Section 22Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(1)(viii)Section 80P

section 80P (1) and 80P (2) (II) FURTHR CBDT ISSUED "circular no. 6/2010 (F. NO. 173 (3)/44/2009-IT (A-1) DATED 20-9-2010 C to give more and more clarity on 80P deduction. Therefore, the assessee is assessed as status of AOP. From aforesaid discussion it is held that assessee is not entitled for deduction u/s 80P

VIDHARBHA KONKAN GRAMIN BANK ,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(5) , NAGPUR

VIDHARBHA KONKAN GRAMIN BANK ,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(5) , NAGPUR

VIDHARBHA KONKAN GRAMIN BANK ,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(5) , NAGPUR

ASHA VINOD TATTE,AMRAVATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, AMRAVATI

PRATHAMIK SHIKSHAK KARMACHARI SAHAKARI PATSANSTHA MARYADIT vs. I.T.O. WARD -2, CHANDRAPUR