Search: penalty u/s 271

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 54Fclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai62 Delhi54 Ahmedabad23 Chennai20 Jaipur20 Indore13 Pune11 Bangalore10 Surat7 Patna6 Kolkata6 Agra5 Raipur5 Chandigarh4 Amritsar4 Lucknow4 Visakhapatnam3 Hyderabad3 Nagpur3 Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 54F10 Section 1485 Section 271(1)(c)3 Section 234A2 Long Term Capital Gains2 Deduction2 Addition to Income2

SHRI RAJESH MOOLCHAND DAYARAMANI,,NAGPUR vs. ACIT-CIRCLE-8,, NAGPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 293/NAG/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Jun 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri P.K. Bansal & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Shri K.P. DewaniFor Respondent: Shri A.R. Ninawe

Section 271(1)(c)Section 54FSection 54F(1)

54F.” 4. The assessee filed detailed reply, however, the Assessing Officer rejecting the contentions of the assessee held that the assessee had deliberately sought to conceal his taxable (real) income through 4 Shri Rajesh Moolchand Dayaramani inaccurate particulars and accordingly, penalty proceedings for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income and concealment of income under section 271

SHRI RAJESH MOOLCHAND DAYARAMANI,,NAGPUR vs. ACIT-CIRCLE-8,, NAGPUR

JEETENDRA CHANDRAKANT NAYAK,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOM TAX(OSD), NAGPUR

SHRI RAJESH MOOLCHAND DAYARAMANI,,NAGPUR vs. ACIT-CIRCLE-8,, NAGPUR

JEETENDRA CHANDRAKANT NAYAK,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOM TAX(OSD), NAGPUR

DY. C.I.T. CIR-.2, NAGPUR vs. SHRI GOVINDDAS GOVERDHAN DAGA, NAGPUR