Search: penalty u/s 271

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 269clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi107 Mumbai78 Jaipur31 Chennai22 Allahabad21 Bangalore19 Hyderabad18 Ahmedabad12 Kolkata8 Indore8 Guwahati5 Nagpur3 Lucknow3 Pune3 Cuttack2 Chandigarh2 Surat1 Jodhpur1 Raipur1 Rajkot1 Agra1

Key Topics

Section 271D15 Section 269S10 Section 2694 Section 271E3 Section 269T3 Section 2713 Penalty3 Section 273B2 Section 143(3)2 Cash Deposit

INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD -4, AMRAVATI vs. SHRI MAHESH SHANKAR SORATE , DARYAPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 250/NAG/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur29 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Manoj G. MoryaniFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe

Section 143(3)Section 269Section 269TSection 271E

271(1)(c) of the Act. Thus in so far as penalty under section 271E is concerned, it was without any satisfaction and therefore, no such penalty could be levied." 2) DCIT, Chandigarh vs M/S Karan Empire Pvt. Ltd., Mohali on 16 February, 2017 (ITA No. ITA No.409/Chd/2011) which held as follows: Shri Mahesh Shankar Sorate ITA no.250/Nag./2018

INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD -4, AMRAVATI vs. SHRI MAHESH SHANKAR SORATE , DARYAPUR

INCOME TAX OFFICER , WARD -4, AMRAVATI vs. SHRI MAHESH SHANKAR SORATE , DARYAPUR

ASHA VINOD TATTE,AMRAVATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, AMRAVATI

PRASAD DIPAKRAO BELORKAR,NAGPUR vs. ITO WARD-1, YAVVATMAL