Search: penalty u/s 271

1 result for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 196clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi123 Mumbai116 Jaipur41 Raipur36 Bangalore32 Chandigarh22 Ahmedabad18 Hyderabad13 Surat7 Guwahati5 Indore5 Lucknow4 Pune3 Kolkata3 Chennai2 Cochin2 Dehradun1 Nagpur1

PURUSHOTTAM NARAYANRAO JADHAO,NAGPUR vs. ITO WARD 3(4), NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 283/NAG/2024[2013-14]Status: HeardITAT Nagpur12 Dec 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Abhay AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe

Section 250Section 271(1)(c)

u/s 250 of the Act is bad in law. 2. Whether on the facts and in law, the learned CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal without providing adequate opportunity of being heard, thereby breaching principles of natural justice. 2 Purshottam Narayanrao Jadhao 3. Whether on the facts and in law, the learned CIT(A) erred in not appreciating