BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 172(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai90Delhi83Jaipur49Raipur35Indore24Allahabad21Chennai20Amritsar11Kolkata9Nagpur7Chandigarh7Hyderabad6Bangalore6Lucknow6Patna6Guwahati5Pune5Ahmedabad3Dehradun3Jodhpur3Cuttack2Rajkot2Surat1Varanasi1Visakhapatnam1

Key Topics

Section 153A15Section 143(3)14Section 234A7Section 1327Section 139(1)7Section 143(1)7Addition to Income7Section 133A5Survey u/s 133A

SHRI SANJAY DHANRAJ JAIN,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), NAGPUR

In the result, assessee' appeal for A

ITA 55/NAG/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Feb 2025AY 2012-13
Section 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 234A

172 (Bom.) (h) CIT Vs. Kabul Chawala (2015) 234 Taxmann 300 (Del.) It has been held that if no incriminating material is found during the course of the search in respect of an issue, then no addition in respect of such an issue can be made in the assessment u/s 153A of the Act. (i) Vijayrattan Balkrishna Mittal vs DCIT

SHRI SANJAY DHANRAJ JAIN,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), NAGPUR

5
ITA 57/NAG/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Feb 2025AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Rajesh LoyaFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 234A

172\n(Bom.)\n(h) CIT Vs. Kabul Chawala (2015) 234 Taxmann 300 (Del.)\nIt has been held that if no incriminating material is found during the\ncourse of the search in respect of an issue, then no addition in respect\nof such an issue can be made in the assessment u/s 153A of the Act.\n(i) Vijayrattan Balkrishna

SHRI SANJAY DHANRAJ JAIN,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), NAGPUR

In the result, assessee' appeal for A

ITA 53/NAG/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Feb 2025AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Shri Rajesh LoyaFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 234A

172\n(Bom.)\n(h) CIT Vs. Kabul Chawala (2015) 234 Taxmann 300 (Del.)\nIt has been held that if no incriminating material is found during the\ncourse of the search in respect of an issue, then no addition in respect\nof such an issue can be made in the assessment u/s 153A of the Act.\n(i) Vijayrattan Balkrishna

SHRI SANJAY DHANRAJ JAIN,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), NAGPUR

In the result, assessee' appeal for A

ITA 58/NAG/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Feb 2025AY 2015-16
For Appellant: Shri Rajesh LoyaFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 234A

172\n(Bom.)\n(h) CIT Vs. Kabul Chawala (2015) 234 Taxmann 300 (Del.)\nIt has been held that if no incriminating material is found during the\ncourse of the search in respect of an issue, then no addition in respect\nof such an issue can be made in the assessment u/s 153A of the Act.\n(i) Vijayrattan Balkrishna

SHRI SANJAY DHANRAJ JAIN,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), NAGPUR

ITA 54/NAG/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Feb 2025AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri Rajesh LoyaFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 234A

172\n(Bom.)\n(h) CIT Vs. Kabul Chawala (2015) 234 Taxmann 300 (Del.)\nIt has been held that if no incriminating material is found during the\ncourse of the search in respect of an issue, then no addition in respect\nof such an issue can be made in the assessment u/s 153A of the Act.\n(i) Vijayrattan Balkrishna

SHRI SANJAY DHANRAJ JAIN,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), NAGPUR

ITA 59/NAG/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Feb 2025AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Shri Rajesh LoyaFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 234A

172\n(Bom.)\n(h) CIT Vs. Kabul Chawala (2015) 234 Taxmann 300 (Del.)\nIt has been held that if no incriminating material is found during the\ncourse of the search in respect of an issue, then no addition in respect\nof such an issue can be made in the assessment u/s 153A of the Act.\n(i) Vijayrattan Balkrishna

SHRI SANJAY DHANRAJ JAIN,NAGPUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), NAGPUR

ITA 56/NAG/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Feb 2025AY 2013-14
For Appellant: Shri Rajesh LoyaFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 132Section 133ASection 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 234A

172\n(Bom.)\n(h) CIT Vs. Kabul Chawala (2015) 234 Taxmann 300 (Del.)\nIt has been held that if no incriminating material is found during the\ncourse of the search in respect of an issue, then no addition in respect\nof such an issue can be made in the assessment u/s 153A of the Act.\n(i) Vijayrattan Balkrishna