GAJANAND FINANCIAL CONSULTANCY PRIVATE LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) NAGPUR, NAGPUR
In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed
ITA 126/NAG/2025[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur22 Sept 2025AY 2013-2014
Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member
For Appellant: Shri Manoj G. MoryaniFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Kumar
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 68
Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act is hereby Initiated separately for concealment of income..
8.1 Hence, in order to protect the interest of the revenue, the addition of Rs.14,10,00,000/- is made in the case of the Assessee…….”
13. The learned PCIT has held that ` 4.60 crore has to be explained by Antariksh Barter