BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 112clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai149Delhi128Jaipur57Bangalore49Raipur41Chennai27Chandigarh24Visakhapatnam18Amritsar17Pune16Panaji13Hyderabad11Ahmedabad9Rajkot8Allahabad7Nagpur7Lucknow6Guwahati5Kolkata5Cuttack4Indore4Jodhpur4Surat3SC1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)20Section 26310Section 143(3)7Penalty4Addition to Income3Section 69A2Section 2502Section 143(1)2Section 143(2)

SHRI KIRTIKUMAR MITESH BHANGADIA,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CENTRAL CIRCLE -2(1), NAGPUR

ITA 114/NAG/2018[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur22 Sept 2023AY 2007-2008

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Gd Padmahshali

For Appellant: Shri Ashok Bansal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Agrawal, DR
Section 271(1)(c)

112/ 2007- Shri Mitesh CIT(A)-3/69 u/s. 271(1)(c) Rs.1,69,783/- Nag./2018 08 G.Bhangdiya /2017-18 ITA No. 113/ 2007- Shri Sanjay CIT(A)-3/32 u/s. 271(1)(c) Rs.12,56,366/- Nag./2018 08 Heda /2017-18 ITA No. 114/ 2007- Shri CIT(A)-3/24 u/s. 271(1)(c) Rs.2,96,653/- Nag./2018

SHRI MITESH G. BHANGDIYA,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISISONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), NAGPUR

ITA 112/NAG/2018[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur22 Sept 2023AY 2007-2008

Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Gd Padmahshali

2
Section 142(1)2
Cash Deposit2
Bench:
For Appellant: Shri Ashok Bansal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Agrawal, DR
Section 271(1)(c)

112/ 2007- Shri Mitesh CIT(A)-3/69 u/s. 271(1)(c) Rs.1,69,783/- Nag./2018 08 G.Bhangdiya /2017-18 ITA No. 113/ 2007- Shri Sanjay CIT(A)-3/32 u/s. 271(1)(c) Rs.12,56,366/- Nag./2018 08 Heda /2017-18 ITA No. 114/ 2007- Shri CIT(A)-3/24 u/s. 271(1)(c) Rs.2,96,653/- Nag./2018

SHRI KIRTIKUMR BHANGDIYA ,NAGPUR vs. ASSISTANT CMMISISONR OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE -2(1), NAGPUR

ITA 115/NAG/2018[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur22 Sept 2023AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Gd Padmahshali

For Appellant: Shri Ashok Bansal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Agrawal, DR
Section 271(1)(c)

112/ 2007- Shri Mitesh CIT(A)-3/69 u/s. 271(1)(c) Rs.1,69,783/- Nag./2018 08 G.Bhangdiya /2017-18 ITA No. 113/ 2007- Shri Sanjay CIT(A)-3/32 u/s. 271(1)(c) Rs.12,56,366/- Nag./2018 08 Heda /2017-18 ITA No. 114/ 2007- Shri CIT(A)-3/24 u/s. 271(1)(c) Rs.2,96,653/- Nag./2018

SHRI SANJAY RAMESHCHANDRAJI HEDA,AMARAVATI vs. ASSISTNT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE -2(1), NAGPUR

ITA 113/NAG/2018[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur22 Sept 2023AY 2007-2008

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Gd Padmahshali

For Appellant: Shri Ashok Bansal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Agrawal, DR
Section 271(1)(c)

112/ 2007- Shri Mitesh CIT(A)-3/69 u/s. 271(1)(c) Rs.1,69,783/- Nag./2018 08 G.Bhangdiya /2017-18 ITA No. 113/ 2007- Shri Sanjay CIT(A)-3/32 u/s. 271(1)(c) Rs.12,56,366/- Nag./2018 08 Heda /2017-18 ITA No. 114/ 2007- Shri CIT(A)-3/24 u/s. 271(1)(c) Rs.2,96,653/- Nag./2018

GAJANAND FINANCIAL CONSULTANCY PRIVATE LIMITED,NAGPUR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL) NAGPUR, NAGPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 126/NAG/2025[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur22 Sept 2025AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Manoj G. MoryaniFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Kumar
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 68

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act is hereby Initiated separately for concealment of income.. 8.1 Hence, in order to protect the interest of the revenue, the addition of Rs.14,10,00,000/- is made in the case of the Assessee…….” 13. The learned PCIT has held that ` 4.60 crore has to be explained by Antariksh Barter

SHRIKANT BHERULAL SHARMA LATE BHERULAL GIRDHARILAL SHARMA ,WASHIM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3, AKOLA

In the result, assessee’s appeal being ITA no

ITA 396/NAG/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur12 Jun 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Ms. Jineshi S. ThakarFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 263Section 69A

u/s. 143(3) and ordered the reassessment of the said issue. However he added one more issue (which was not a part of limited scrutiny) viz. A.O. to examine cash balance of Rs.23,87,017/- and bank balance of Rs. 19,22,485/- in Akola Janta Coop. Bank Ltd. The Ld. Pr.C.I.T had passed the said order without properly applying

SHRIKANT BHERULAL SHARMA LATE BHERULAL GIRDHARILAL SHARMA,WASHIM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -3 , AKOLA

In the result, assessee’s appeal being ITA no

ITA 395/NAG/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur12 Jun 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Ms. Jineshi S. ThakarFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 263Section 69A

u/s. 143(3) and ordered the reassessment of the said issue. However he added one more issue (which was not a part of limited scrutiny) viz. A.O. to examine cash balance of Rs.23,87,017/- and bank balance of Rs. 19,22,485/- in Akola Janta Coop. Bank Ltd. The Ld. Pr.C.I.T had passed the said order without properly applying