Search: house property

3 results for “house property”+ Section 80Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Jaipur28 Delhi24 Mumbai19 Bangalore13 Cochin9 Pune9 Lucknow7 Kolkata5 Cuttack4 Nagpur3 Indore3 Visakhapatnam2 Chennai2 Jodhpur2 Raipur2 Ahmedabad2 Allahabad1 SC1 Hyderabad1 Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 2636 Section 80C5 Section 271D5 Section 143(3)4 Section 54E3 Section 1483 Deduction3 Section 54B2 Section 269S2 House Property

VAISHALI ARVIND TAYADE,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5, AMARAVATI

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands allowed

ITA 374/NAG/2022[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur21 Mar 2025AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao

For Appellant: Shri Rachit ThakarFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke

Section 80C

section 80C (LIC/PPF) was disallowed. The Assessing Officer has also disallowed the interest paid on borrowed capital amounting to ` 3 Vaishali Arvind Tayade ITA no.374/Nag./2022 78,540, aggregating to the total disallowance of ` 1,22,310. Consequent upon passing of the assessment order by the Assessing Officer, the assessee filed appeal before the first appellate authority. 5. The learned

SUSHILA BHAURAO DESHMUKH,AMRAVATI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

VAISHALI ARVIND TAYADE,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5, AMARAVATI

SUSHILA BHAURAO DESHMUKH,AMRAVATI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, NAGPUR

VAISHALI ARVIND TAYADE,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5, AMARAVATI

SUSHILA BHAURAO DESHMUKH,AMRAVATI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, NAGPUR

SHRI PRAKASH JIWANDAS WANJARI,NAGPUR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NAGPUR