BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “house property”+ Section 282clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka457Mumbai339Delhi328Bangalore160Jaipur78Chandigarh68Hyderabad52Ahmedabad52Chennai48Kolkata46Indore25Cochin24Rajkot22Pune20Calcutta16Telangana11Amritsar10Agra10Raipur8Surat8Nagpur6Visakhapatnam5Jodhpur5Patna5Cuttack4Rajasthan4SC3Kerala2Lucknow1Guwahati1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 2636Section 143(3)5Section 69B4Addition to Income4Section 683Section 271(1)(c)3Section 1483Section 54E3Section 80P(2)2

SUSHILA BHAURAO DESHMUKH,AMRAVATI vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 76/NAG/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur20 Sept 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri V. Durgarao & Shrik.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: ShriK.P. DewaniFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Salunke
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 263(1)Section 54BSection 54E

house property constructed on the said land. The AO has failed to verify the above issue and also whether the said land was used by the assessee. for agricultural purpose in the two years immediately preceding the date on which the transfer took place. The assessee has provided 7/12 extracts for FY 1980-81, 2011-12, 2016-17, and from

Business Income2
Deduction2
Survey u/s 133A2

SHRI VISHWAKARAMA JEWELLERS ,AKOLA vs. DCIT AKOLA CIRCLE, AKOLA

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 99/NAG/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur22 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri S.G. GandhiFor Respondent: Shri Surjit Kumar Saha
Section 115BSection 133ASection 143(3)Section 69B

282 Undisclosed Investment in Silver ` 6,21,348 Undisclosed investment in precious stones Undisclosed investment in diamond jewellery ` 58,55,236 Undisclosed investment in platinum jewellery ` 62,993 Total undisclosed investment ` 69,37,859 5. The learned CIT(A) partially allowed the appeal by holding as follows:– “Accordingly, the arguments of the appellant that the surrendered income

SMT. NALINI SHYAM MOUNDEKAR,,NAGPUR vs. ITO, WARD- 4(1),, NAGPUR

In the result, these appeals by the assessee stand allowed as above

ITA 516/NAG/2014[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur27 Mar 2017AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Ram Lal Negi..

For Appellant: Shri K.P. DewaniFor Respondent: Shri A.R. Ninawe
Section 144Section 148Section 5

House Property”, Rs.25,000/- under the head “Income from documentation work” and Rs.1,30,000/- under the head “Income from other sources” as it is unexplained investment. The AO has discussed the issues on the basis of which the additions were made in Para Nos. 10 to 18 of the assessment order. 7. It is quite manifest from the above

ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-5, NAGPUR vs. THE NIRMAL UJWAL CREDIT CO-OP SOCIETY LTD, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue for the assessment year

ITA 390/NAG/2019[2012-13]Status: HeardITAT Nagpur27 Nov 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Manoj G. MoryaniFor Respondent: Shri Vikash Agrawal
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 80PSection 80P(2)

housing project as construction activity and further calculating the income from this construction activity of the appellant at the rate of 8% based on presumption basis of taxation provided in Section 44AD. Hence your Honor is requested to consider the matter in above perspective and kindly delete the additions made by the learned

SHRI KARIM KAMRUDDIN MALIK,NAGPUR vs. ITO, WARD-1(3), NAGPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeal is allowed

ITA 199/NAG/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur29 Jun 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri P.K. Bansal & Shri Amarjit Singh

For Appellant: Shri K.P. DevaniFor Respondent: Shri A.R. Ninawe
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)

Housing Society Flat no.301, Byramji Town …………… Appellant Opp. Poonam Chambers, Chhaoni Nagpur 440 013 PAN ANFPM8213K v/s Income Tax Officer ..…….………. Respondent Ward–1(3), Nagpur Assessee by : Shri K.P. Devani Revenue by : Shri A.R. Ninawe Date of Hearing – 21.06.2017 Date of Order – 30.06.2017 O R D E R PER AMARJIT SINGH, J.M. The assessee has filed the present appeal against

RAVINDRA MADANLAL KHANDELWAL,AKOLA vs. DCIT/ACIT CIRCLE , AKOLA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 375/NAG/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur18 Nov 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 142(1)Section 143Section 144BSection 68

property of the tax payer, however, same can be easily fetched by the department by issue of summons. j) Copy of documentary evidences to substantiate genuineness of the lenders:- The fact that the transaction was indeed in a realm of a loan, is apparent from the fact that almost all the loans borrowed from the third parties were repaid