BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “house property”+ Section 255(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka430Delhi326Mumbai266Bangalore166Chandigarh71Jaipur60Chennai57Calcutta50Ahmedabad39Indore31Hyderabad31Telangana29Kolkata23Pune23Cochin21Surat18Guwahati16Rajkot11Visakhapatnam8Cuttack8Patna8SC7Jodhpur5Lucknow5Rajasthan4Nagpur4Panaji3Orissa2Amritsar2Kerala2Dehradun1Raipur1Andhra Pradesh1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 80P(2)(a)22Section 80I8Section 271D5Deduction4Section 1483Disallowance3Section 269S2Section 80P2Section 80P(2)(d)2Section 80P(2)(c)

THE VIDHARBHA PREMIER CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD,,NAGPUR vs. TAX RECOVERY OFFICER, RANGE-6, NAGPUR

In the result these appeals by the assessee and revenue stand allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 232/NAG/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 Jan 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Ram Lal Negi..

For Appellant: Shri Alok Bha gatFor Respondent: Shri A.R. Ninawe
Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(c)Section 80P(2)(d)

4) Other receipts a) Loan incidental charges 10,52,853.00 b) Loan consolidation charges 78,148.00 c) Inoperative Saving A/c charges 1,47,460.00 d) Working charges(flat transfer fee) 2,96,100.00 e) Loan commitment charges 9,08,448.00 24,83,010.00 _______________________________ Total Rs. 14,62,54,397.00 Profit attributable to these receipts amounting

2

ITO, WARD-6(1),, NAGPUR vs. THE VIDARBHA PREMIER CO-OP. HOUSING SOCIETY,, NAGPUR

In the result these appeals by the assessee and revenue stand allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 224/NAG/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur09 Jan 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Ram Lal Negi..

For Appellant: Shri Alok Bha gatFor Respondent: Shri A.R. Ninawe
Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(c)Section 80P(2)(d)

4) Other receipts a) Loan incidental charges 10,52,853.00 b) Loan consolidation charges 78,148.00 c) Inoperative Saving A/c charges 1,47,460.00 d) Working charges(flat transfer fee) 2,96,100.00 e) Loan commitment charges 9,08,448.00 24,83,010.00 _______________________________ Total Rs. 14,62,54,397.00 Profit attributable to these receipts amounting

SHRI PRAKASH JIWANDAS WANJARI,NAGPUR vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NAGPUR

In the result, we are of the considered view that the case on hand does not warrant levy of penalty under Section 271D of the Act

ITA 232/NAG/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur25 Oct 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 269SSection 271DSection 273ASection 80C

4 said that the reply submitted by the assessee was without any merit since assessee is also having taxable salary income and therefore is not covered by the exception granted to cash transactions between 2 persons having only agricultural income. 2.12 The LAO here has only pointed out the only about the strict provision of the section

HIGH RISE CONSTRUCTION,NAGPUR vs. I.T.O. WARD 1(5), NAGPUR

In the result this appeal by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 285/NAG/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur18 Jan 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya.

For Appellant: Shri Manoj MoryaniFor Respondent: Shri A.R. Ninawe
Section 250Section 80I

4. Judgement of ITAT, Pune Bench dated 27-05-2014 in ITA No. 667/PN/2013 in the case of Hiraman Nivrutti Bhujbal vs. ITO. 5. Vertex Home P. Ltd. vs. DCIT (2015) 43 ITR (Trib) 340 (Hyd.) 6. Patel Jashwantlal A & Patel Purnamchand N vs. ITO (2015) 38 ITR (Trib.) 135 (Ahd.). 7. ACIT vs. Ekta Sankalp Developers