BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “house property”+ Section 194C(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi64Mumbai62Bangalore26Raipur19Ahmedabad16Jaipur9Hyderabad9Cuttack7Rajkot6Chennai6Lucknow5Indore5Surat3Kolkata3Nagpur3Pune3SC2Patna1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 1486Section 142(1)3Section 44A3Section 139(1)3Section 194C3Business Income3TDS3Addition to Income3

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2, CHANDRAPUR vs. NITIN SUBHASH SHARMA, CHANDRAPUR

In the result, appeals by the Revenue for the A

ITA 362/NAG/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur27 Jan 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 148Section 194CSection 44A

1) or in response to notice u/s 148 of the Act, whether before AO or CIT(A). 4. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred by relying on the grounds of appeal of the assessee that amount of Rs. 4,16,42,363/- was business receipts and also crred on the facts by concluding that assessee was engaged in the business

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2, CHANDRAPUR vs. NITIN SUBHASH SHARMA, CHANDRAPUR

In the result, appeals by the Revenue for the A

ITA 363/NAG/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur27 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 148Section 194CSection 44A

1) or in response to notice u/s 148 of the Act, whether before AO or CIT(A). 4. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred by relying on the grounds of appeal of the assessee that amount of Rs. 4,16,42,363/- was business receipts and also crred on the facts by concluding that assessee was engaged in the business

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2, CHANDRAPUR vs. NITIN SUBHASH SHARMA, CHANDRAPUR

In the result, appeals by the Revenue for the A

ITA 364/NAG/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur27 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 148Section 194CSection 44A

1) or in response to notice u/s 148 of the Act, whether before AO or CIT(A). 4. The Ld. CIT(A) has erred by relying on the grounds of appeal of the assessee that amount of Rs. 4,16,42,363/- was business receipts and also crred on the facts by concluding that assessee was engaged in the business