BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 928clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai267Delhi177Ahmedabad80Bangalore78Kolkata61Chennai41Pune34Hyderabad32Jaipur22Chandigarh22Cuttack14Indore8Cochin8Surat7Visakhapatnam7Jodhpur6Guwahati5Panaji4Nagpur3Amritsar3Rajkot3Karnataka3Raipur2Lucknow2Ranchi2Telangana1Patna1Punjab & Haryana1SC1

Key Topics

Section 1483Disallowance3Addition to Income3Section 242Section 10(34)2Section 139(1)2Section 153A2Section 54F2Unexplained Investment2Deduction

NARAYAN MAHADEORAO DHAWANE,MAHARASHTRA, NAGPUR vs. ITO WARD -5(1), MAHARASHTRA, NAGPUR

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands allowed

ITA 414/NAG/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur21 Mar 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao

For Appellant: Shri R.K. GaneriwalFor Respondent: Shri Abhay Y. Marathe
Section 148Section 50CSection 53FSection 54F

disallowance of deduction u/s 54F of Rs.3,44,148/- and addition u/s 50C of Rs.1,04,480/-is incorrect, illegal, bad in law and without natural justice and the same is to be deleted. 4. The addition of Total Rs.4,48,628/- levied on appellant is incorrect, illegal, bad in law and without natural justice and the same

DY. C.I.T. CENTRAL CIR.-2(2), NAGPUR vs. M/S SHREE AGRAWAL FINANCE INDIA P. LTD.,, NAGPUR

2

In the result, Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 176/NAG/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur15 May 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Sachin V. LuthraFor Respondent: Harshad S. Vengurlekar
Section 10(34)Section 10(35)Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 24

disallowing the deemed dividend of Rs.6,49,70,741 (Rs.6,46,05,741 + Rs.3,65,000) (Revised after rectification to Rs. 1,72,80,539/-). 11. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the learned CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs.40,63,928/- made on account of unexplained cash deposits

I.T.O. WARD - 2,KHAMGAON, KHAMGAON vs. M/S SHRI HANUMAN ONION TRADING CO.,,

In the result this appeal filed by the Revenue is stands dismissed

ITA 534/NAG/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur10 Jan 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya. (S.M.C.)

For Appellant: Shri A.R. NinaweFor Respondent: Shri Vijay Chandak
Section 36(1)(iii)Section 69

disallowance by the Assessing Officer are as under : The assessee is a firm consisting of five partners. The firm derives income from trading of onion, chillies and adat etc. During the course of assessment proceedings, on perusal of the balance sheet, the AO found that the assessee firm has shown receivables of Rs.3,81,928/- from Best Cold Storage