THE VIDHARBHA PREMIER CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD,,NAGPUR vs. TAX RECOVERY OFFICER, RANGE-6, NAGPUR

In the result these appeals by the assessee and revenue stand allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Ram Lal Negi..

section, and all other incomes are not ancillary to or incidental to the activity of providing credit facilities to the members, and are not eligible for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i). 9) That the CIT(A) erred in not considering the nature of other incomes of the Appellant society, and disallowed

ITO, WARD-6(1),, NAGPUR vs. THE VIDARBHA PREMIER CO-OP. HOUSING SOCIETY,, NAGPUR

In the result these appeals by the assessee and revenue stand allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Ram Lal Negi..

section, and all other incomes are not ancillary to or incidental to the activity of providing credit facilities to the members, and are not eligible for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i). 9) That the CIT(A) erred in not considering the nature of other incomes of the Appellant society, and disallowed

VIDHARBHA KONKAN GRAMIN BANK ,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(5) , NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

section 80P (1) and 80P (2) (II) FURTHR CBDT ISSUED "circular no. 6/2010 (F. NO. 173 (3)/44/2009-IT (A-1) DATED 20-9-2010 C to give more and more clarity on 80P deduction. Therefore, the assessee is assessed as status of AOP. From aforesaid discussion it is held that assessee is not entitled for deduction u/s 80P

VIDHARBHA KONKAN GRAMIN BANK ,NAGPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(5) , NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for A

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

section 80P (1) and 80P (2) (II) FURTHR CBDT ISSUED "circular no. 6/2010 (F. NO. 173 (3)/44/2009-IT (A-1) DATED 20-9-2010 C to give more and more clarity on 80P deduction. Therefore, the assessee is assessed as status of AOP. From aforesaid discussion it is held that assessee is not entitled for deduction u/s 80P

SHRI SAIBABA BAHUUDDESHIYA NAGRIK CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY,NAGPUR vs. ITO WARD (3)(4), NAGPUR

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry

80P(2)(d) of the Act by observing and holding as under: “8. We have considered the submissions of both sides and perused the material available on record. The only dispute raised by the assessee is against the disallowance of deduction under section

ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-5, NAGPUR vs. THE NIRMAL UJWAL CREDIT CO-OP SOCIETY LTD, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal for the A

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

section 80P is allowable. As I have already discussed this issue at length above, same is not reproduced for the sake of brevity. Hence, the Assessing Officer is directed to allow 80P deduction on the extended income computed by the virtue of this disallowance. 6.2 To sum up, the disallowance of Rs. 3,47,12,803/- [Rs. 2

ACIT, CIRCLE-4, NAGPUR, NAGPUR vs. THE VIDARBHA CO OPERATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION LTD , NAGPUR

In the result, appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry& Shri K.M. Roy

disallowance of deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act in respect of interest income received from the Co-operative

JAI KONDESHWAR NAGARI SAHAKARI BADNERAPAT SANSTHA MARYADIT ,AMRAVATI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3, AMRAVATI, AMRAVATI

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed in the aforesaid terms

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry

disallowance of deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act in respect of interest income received from the Co-operative

BHATADI OPENCAST KARMACHARI SAHAKARI PATSANSTHA MARYADIT ,BHATADI,CHANDRAPUR vs. ITO WARD-1, CHANDRAPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry

80P(2)(d) by observing and holding as under:– "8. We have considered the submissions of both sides and perused the material available on record. The only dispute raised by the assessee is against the disallowance of deduction under section

HINGANGHAT NAGRI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA,HINGANGHAT vs. INCOME TAX WARD-1, WARDHA

In the result, appeal by the assessee for A

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

disallowing the benefit of Sec 80P of Rs.53,72,108/- based on the same, even 2 Hinganghat Nagri Sahakari Pat Sanstha ITA no.569/Nag./2024 after the return was filed within Assessment Proceeding as on 17.01.2023 bearing Ack No. 923756621170123 which is acknowledged in the Assessment Order itself. 3. That the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) had erred in law and facts

HINGANGHAT NAGRI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA,HINGANGHAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, WARDHA

In the result, appeal by the assessee for A

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

disallowing the benefit of Sec 80P of Rs.53,72,108/- based on the same, even 2 Hinganghat Nagri Sahakari Pat Sanstha ITA no.569/Nag./2024 after the return was filed within Assessment Proceeding as on 17.01.2023 bearing Ack No. 923756621170123 which is acknowledged in the Assessment Order itself. 3. That the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) had erred in law and facts

HINGANGHAT NAGRI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA,HINGANGHAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, WARDHA

In the result, appeal by the assessee for A

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

disallowing the benefit of Sec 80P of Rs.53,72,108/- based on the same, even 2 Hinganghat Nagri Sahakari Pat Sanstha ITA no.569/Nag./2024 after the return was filed within Assessment Proceeding as on 17.01.2023 bearing Ack No. 923756621170123 which is acknowledged in the Assessment Order itself. 3. That the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) had erred in law and facts

ASSTT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-5, NAGPUR vs. THE NIRMAL UJWAL CREDIT CO-OP SOCIETY LTD, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue for the assessment year

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. 9. The AO in his assessment order further contended that although the main business of the appellant is to provide credit facilities to its members, the appellant had diverted the funds of the society and accordingly the income may have been earned is also diverted from the main activity of credit facility

THE GREEN CITY NAGRI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA MARYADIT,NAGPUR vs. ITO WARD 2(2), NAGPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

section 80P(2)(a)(i) are not applicable to the co- operative society providing banking or credit facilities to its member and accordingly deduction U/s 80P is not allowable deduction under the Act? 6. The CIT(A) (NFAC) erred in law for disallowing

LATE INDIRA GANDHI NAGRI SAHAKARI PAT PURWATHA SANSTHA MARYADIT,AKOLA vs. ITO, WARD-2, AKOLA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao

disallow the deduction claimed u/s 80P(2)(a). Many decisions allowing deduction under similar facts ofthe society. The appellant request you to allow the deduction of Rs. 4452374/- u/s 80P(2)(a)(i). 2. Allow deduction under Section

M/S VINAYAK NAGARI SAHAKARI PAT. SANSTHA,BHANDARA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2, BHANDRA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao

section 80P(2)(a)(i) are not applicable to the co- operative society providing banking or credit facilities to its member and accordingly deduction U/s 80P is not allowable deduction under the Act? 8. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (NFAC) erred in law for not justified in proceedings for disallowance

BHARTI MAIND NAGRI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA,YAVATMAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NATIONAL E ASSESSMENT , YAVATMAL

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for the assessment year

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

disallowances is eligible for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax act'1961. 5) Interest u/s 234A, 234 B and 234 C of the Income Tax act '1961 being consequential in nature needs to be deleted. 6) Assessee craves leave to add, alter or amend any of the grounds of appeal.” 3. Facts in Brief:– The assessee

BHARTI MAIND NAGRI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA,YAVATMAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE , NATIONAL E ASSESSMENT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for the assessment year

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

disallowances is eligible for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax act'1961. 5) Interest u/s 234A, 234 B and 234 C of the Income Tax act '1961 being consequential in nature needs to be deleted. 6) Assessee craves leave to add, alter or amend any of the grounds of appeal.” 3. Facts in Brief:– The assessee