BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “disallowance”+ Section 80G(5)(vi)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai207Pune138Delhi122Bangalore82Kolkata63Ahmedabad62Chennai50Jaipur26Hyderabad21Chandigarh19Lucknow16Indore9Rajkot8Ranchi7Cuttack5Surat4Visakhapatnam3Raipur3Nagpur2Amritsar2Telangana2Allahabad1Panaji1Cochin1SC1Jodhpur1Guwahati1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 12A7Section 143(1)4Section 143(1)(a)3Section 112Section 80G2Exemption2Addition to Income2

SANT SHANKAR MAHARAJ AASHRAM ,AMRAVATI vs. DCIT ACIT CIR-EXEMP, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 556/NAG/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Jan 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 11Section 11ASection 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 80GSection 80G(5)(vi)

5. The reason for addition is as incorrect claim under section 143(1)(a)(ii) of the Act is reproduced from Paper Book Page–58 & 59:– Para–A Adjustments u/s 143(1)(a) Amount in ` as Sl. Error In Income Tax Schedule Variance No. Description Return computed The details provided at sr. Part–A General no.A/9

GAURISHANKAR SEWA SAMITI ,NANDURA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2, NAGPUR

ITA 73/NAG/2024[2021-20222]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur21 Mar 2025
For Appellant: Shri Sanjay ThakarFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 12ASection 143(1)(a)Section 154

disallowing the Assessee's Appeal. 2) Learned CIT(A) erred in confirming the A.O.'s order without any basis. 3) Learned A.O. erred in disallowing/not allowing the deduction amounting to Rs.5,81,55,514/-. 4) Learned CIT(A) erred in not properly considered Assessee's Written Submission/Statement of Facts and he has not applying his mind and without any basis