BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 80G(5)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai319Delhi151Ahmedabad71Kolkata71Bangalore58Chennai52Pune41Jaipur36Hyderabad26Indore22Rajkot14Lucknow11Surat11Chandigarh6Visakhapatnam5Jodhpur5Raipur4Nagpur3Cochin3Amritsar2Ranchi2SC2Agra1Dehradun1Cuttack1Panaji1Allahabad1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 12A12Section 119Section 143(1)8Section 80G3Section 143(1)(a)3Exemption3Section 122Disallowance2Addition to Income2

SANT SHANKAR MAHARAJ AASHRAM ,AMRAVATI vs. DCIT ACIT CIR-EXEMP, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 556/NAG/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Jan 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri K.M. Roy, Accountant, Member

For Appellant: Shri Mahavir AtalFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 11Section 11ASection 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 80GSection 80G(5)(vi)

5. The reason for addition is as incorrect claim under section 143(1)(a)(ii) of the Act is reproduced from Paper Book Page–58 & 59:– Para–A Adjustments u/s 143(1)(a) Amount in ` as Sl. Error In Income Tax Schedule Variance No. Description Return computed The details provided at sr. Part–A General no.A/9

MANAV SEVA LOK KALYAN MAHASANGH,NAGPUR vs. DCIT/ACIT CIRCLE EXEMPTIOM, NAGPUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 326/NAG/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur26 Mar 2026AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Khettra Mohan Roymanav Seva Lok Kalyan Vs Dcit/Acit, Circle Mahasangh, H.No. 32, Teka Exemption, Nagpur Naka, Asi Nagar, Nagpur. Pan : Aabtm 1643 C Assessee Respondent Assessee By : Shri Kapil Hirani, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Pankaj Kumar, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 25.02.2026 Date Of Pronouncement : 26.03.2026

For Appellant: Shri Kapil Hirani, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 12A(1)(b)Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 250Section 44ASection 80G

disallowance of the benefit of income applied for charitable purposes apparently and allegedly by denying the benefit of exemption under section 11 and section 12 of the Act solely on account of belated filing in Form 10B ignoring the fact that the alleged delay was marginal and on account of circumstances beyond the control of the Appellant and which deserved

GAURISHANKAR SEWA SAMITI ,NANDURA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2, NAGPUR

In the result, assessee's appeal stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 73/NAG/2024[2021-20222]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur21 Mar 2025
For Appellant: Shri Sanjay ThakarFor Respondent: Shri Sandipkumar Salunke
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154

5,81,55,514, for the reason that in Schedule Part-A General Details of\nRegistration or approval under the Income Tax Act, 1961 (\"the Act\") details of\nsection 12AB or 10(23c) (iv)/10(23c)(v)/10(23c) (vi)/10(23c)(via) are not\nprovided in the column section under which the registration is applied.\nThe act has been